RhetoricStyleL.7.3a

Concision

Omit needless words: cut redundancy, empty phrases, and weak openings like “There is” and “It is.”

Not started Jump to practice

After choosing the right words (diction), cut the words that do no work. You started this in Composition’s Concise Writing. In 1918 William Strunk Jr. put the rule in three words: “Omit needless words.”

His explanation is worth reading whole: “Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.”

From Rule 13 of The Elements of Style (1918).
Wordy (Strunk’s examples, 1918)Concise
the question as to whetherwhether
there is no doubt but thatno doubt (doubtless)
used for fuel purposesused for fuel
in a hasty mannerhastily
owing to the fact thatsince (because)
in spite of the fact thatthough (although)
His story is a strange one.His story is strange.

Four kinds of needless words

  • Redundancy: saying it twice (past history, end result, each and every, completely finished).
  • Empty phrases: owing to the fact that, at this point in time, in order to.
  • Weak openings: There is …, It is … that, which delay the real subject and verb.
  • Throat-clearing: In my opinion, I think that, It is important to note that.

Key idea

Make every word tell. Cut redundancy, empty phrases, weak openings and throat-clearing, but keep the details that carry meaning.

Why it works

Every needless word spends a little of the reader’s attention and gives nothing back. Concise prose also sounds more confident: “Because it rained, we stayed in” is surer than “Owing to the fact that it was raining, we made the decision to remain inside.”
Step through the cuts.

Worked example: Cut, but keep the meaning

Revise: “In my opinion, I think that the end result of the new schedule is that each and every student has more time to eat lunch.”
  1. “In my opinion, I think that” is throat-clearing; the reader knows it is your opinion.
  2. “End result” and “each and every” are redundant.
  3. “The end result of … is that” is an empty frame around the real claim.

Answer: “The new schedule gives every student more time for lunch.”

Common mistake

Thinking longer sounds smarter, and padding sentences with phrases that add no meaning. Readers notice padding, and it buries your point. But concision isn’t the same as shortness: Strunk said the rule does not mean avoiding detail. Check: for each phrase, ask “What would the reader lose without it?” If nothing, cut it.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

@teddyrookbook GitHub