Modern PhysicsSpecial Relativity

The Relativistic Doppler Effect

Light from an approaching source arrives at f = f₀√((1 + β)/(1 − β)), with β = v/c.

Not started Jump to practice

For sound, the Doppler formula depends on who moves: the source, or the listener, relative to the air. Light has no medium, so only the relative velocity of source and observer can matter. The relativistic formula combines the crowding of wavefronts with time dilation of the source's own clock. Astronomers use it to measure how fast galaxies, stars and quasars move along our line of sight.

Key idea

With $\beta = v/c$ the speed of approach, $$f = f_0\sqrt{\frac{1 + \beta}{1 - \beta}}\qquad(\text{approaching}),$$ and for a receding source, swap the signs: $f = f_0\sqrt{\frac{1 - \beta}{1 + \beta}}$. In wavelengths, a receding source gives $\lambda = \lambda_0\sqrt{\frac{1 + \beta}{1 - \beta}}$, a redshift $z = \frac{\lambda - \lambda_0}{\lambda_0}$.

Why it works

Let a source recede at $v$ and emit wave crests every $T_0$ by its own clock. In our frame its clock runs slow, so crests leave every $\gamma T_0$. Between crests the source moves $v\gamma T_0$ farther away, so each crest has an extra distance to travel, and the crests arrive spaced by $$\lambda = (c + v)\gamma T_0 = \lambda_0(1 + \beta)\gamma = \lambda_0\frac{1 + \beta}{\sqrt{(1 - \beta)(1 + \beta)}} = \lambda_0\sqrt{\frac{1 + \beta}{1 - \beta}}.$$ The same steps for an approaching source give the inverse factor. Work it out instead from a moving observer's point of view and you get the same answer, as postulate 1 requires.
Waves from an approaching and a receding source. At $\beta = 0.3$, approach raises the frequency by a factor of 1.36 and recession lowers it to 0.73 of the original.

Worked examples

Worked example: A receding galaxy

Hydrogen's red line has $\lambda_0 = 656.3$ nm. Where does it appear in the spectrum of a galaxy receding at $0.10c$?
  1. $\sqrt{\frac{1.10}{0.90}} = \sqrt{1.222} = 1.1055$.
  2. $\lambda = 656.3 \times 1.1055 = 725.6$ nm, in the infrared, just past the red end of the visible spectrum.

Answer: $725.6$ nm ($z = 0.106$)

Worked example: How fast is it going?

A quasar's spectral lines arrive with $z = 0.50$. Assuming the shift is from motion away from us, how fast is it receding?
  1. $1 + z = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda_0} = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \beta}{1 - \beta}}$, so $(1 + z)^2 = 2.25 = \frac{1 + \beta}{1 - \beta}$.
  2. Solve: $\beta = \frac{(1 + z)^2 - 1}{(1 + z)^2 + 1} = \frac{1.25}{3.25} = 0.385$.

Answer: $v = 0.385c$

Worked example: Light against sound

A source approaches at $0.60c$. Compare the relativistic factor with the sound formula for a moving source, $\frac{1}{1 - \beta}$.
  1. Relativistic: $\sqrt{\frac{1.60}{0.40}} = \sqrt{4} = 2.00$.
  2. Sound-style: $\frac{1}{1 - 0.60} = 2.50$.
  3. They differ by the time-dilation factor $\gamma = 1.25$: $2.50/1.25 = 2.00$.

Answer: The frequency doubles, not $2.5\times$

For large cosmic redshifts, most of the shift comes from the expansion of space itself rather than motion through space, so $z = 0.50$ is better read with cosmology (see the Astrophysics course). For stars and nearby galaxies, the formula here is the right one.

Common mistake

Using the sound Doppler formula for light. For sound, a moving source and a moving listener give different answers, because the air picks out a frame. Light has no such frame, and its formula depends only on the relative speed, with time dilation built in. Check: for light, approaching at $\beta$ and then receding at $\beta$ must give factors that are exact reciprocals.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 3 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

  • OpenStax University Physics Volume 3, 5.7 Doppler Effect for Light
  • MIT OpenCourseWare 8.20 Introduction to Special Relativity (January IAP 2005)
@teddyrookbook GitHub