Memory SkillsForgetting and Spacing

Relearning Is Faster

Even when you can't recall something, relearning it takes less time than the first learning; Ebbinghaus called this savings.

Not started Jump to practice

Ebbinghaus did not only ask what he could recall. He also timed how long it took to relearn a list until he knew it perfectly again. Relearning was always quicker than learning the first time. He called the time saved the savings.

Key idea

Savings (percent) = (first learning time − relearning time) ÷ first learning time × 100.

Worked example: Worked example

A list took 20 minutes to learn. A week later it took 8 minutes to relearn. What were the savings?
  1. Time saved: 20 − 8 = 12 minutes.
  2. 12 ÷ 20 = 0.6.
  3. 0.6 × 100 = 60 percent.

Answer: 60 percent savings.

Worked example: Another example

Learning took 30 minutes and relearning took 30 minutes. What does that tell you?
  1. 30 − 30 = 0 minutes saved.
  2. 0 percent savings: nothing was kept.

Answer: 0 percent: as if learning from scratch.

Why it works

Savings show that forgetting is rarely complete. A memory you can't pull up may still be partly stored, and a review rebuilds it fast. That is why short reviews work.

Common mistake

Giving up on a subject you "forgot." A quick review costs much less than the first learning.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

This is one of the top rungs of Memory Skills.

Sources and further reading

@teddyrookbook GitHub Sources and credits