Two events are independent when knowing one happened does not change the chance of the other: $P(A \cap B) = P(A)P(B)$, as in independent events. For three or more events, and for events that cannot happen together, the details matter.
Key idea
Why it works
Worked examples
Worked example: Disjoint is dependent
- $P(A \cap B) = 0$, since one roll cannot be both.
- $P(A)P(B) = \frac{1}{6} \cdot \frac{1}{6} = \frac{1}{36} \ne 0$.
Answer: No. They are mutually exclusive, which makes them dependent.
Worked example: At least one of three
- Complement: all three fail. By independence, $$P(\text{none}) = 0.1 \times 0.2 \times 0.3 = 0.006$$
- $$P(\text{at least one}) = 1 - 0.006 = 0.994$$
- For "exactly one", add three disjoint cases: $$0.9(0.2)(0.3) + 0.1(0.8)(0.3) + 0.1(0.2)(0.7) = 0.054 + 0.024 + 0.014 = 0.092$$
Answer: $0.994$ (and $0.092$ for exactly one)
Worked example: Independent in pairs only
- Each event has probability $\frac{1}{2}$. $A \cap B = \{HH\}$, $A \cap C = \{HH\}$, $B \cap C = \{HH\}$: each has probability $\frac{1}{4} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2}$. So every pair is independent.
- $A \cap B \cap C = \{HH\}$ has probability $\frac{1}{4}$, but $P(A)P(B)P(C) = \frac{1}{8}$.
Answer: Independent in pairs, but not mutually independent: knowing A and B forces C.
Common mistake