"Same size and shape" is a good first idea, but it is hard to check or prove. Geometry makes it precise with the rigid motions from Composing Transformations: two figures are congruent if some sequence of translations, reflections and rotations carries one exactly onto the other.
Why it works
Key idea
Worked example: Finding the motion
- $\overline{AB}$ points right (4 units); $\overline{DE}$ points down (4 units). $\overline{AC}$ points up (2 units); $\overline{DF}$ points right (2 units). Right turns into down and up turns into right: that is a $90^\circ$ clockwise turn, $(x, y) \to (y, -x)$.
- Rotate: $A \to (2, -1)$, $B \to (2, -5)$, $C \to (4, -1)$.
- Each image is 4 units right of its target, so translate by $\langle -4, 0 \rangle$: $(2, -1) \to (-2, -1) = D$, $(2, -5) \to (-2, -5) = E$ and $(4, -1) \to (0, -1) = F$.
Answer: A $90^\circ$ clockwise rotation about the origin followed by a translation of $\langle -4, 0 \rangle$ maps $\triangle ABC$ onto $\triangle DEF$, so they are congruent.
Worked example: Showing two figures are not congruent
- A rigid motion keeps every length, so congruent triangles have the same three side lengths.
- The lists $\{5, 5, 6\}$ and $\{5, 6, 6\}$ differ.
Answer: No rigid motion can map one onto the other: they are not congruent.
Common mistake