Putnam 2001
Read the problems at the official link. The 2001 Putnam problems are Β© the Mathematical Association of America, so we don't reproduce them here. Open the 2001 problems (PDF) from the Putnam Archive.
The topic labels, hints and solutions below are our own, written from scratch: our solutions, not official ones. If you spot a mistake, please use βReport a problemβ at the bottom of the page.
A1 Algebra: one identity for a binary operation implies another
- Hint 1. The identity holds for every pair. Use it with the first slot filled by $b*a$.
Our solution (not official)
Key idea: apply the given identity to the pair $(b*a,\ b)$, then simplify the inside with the identity again.
The rule $(x*y)*x=y$ holds for all $x,y\in S$.
- With $x=b$, $y=a$: $(b*a)*b=a$.
- With $x=b*a$, $y=b$: $\big((b*a)*b\big)*(b*a)=b$.
Substitute the first line into the second: $a*(b*a)=b$, which is what we wanted.
How we checked it: proof only (two substitutions)
A2 Probability: parity of heads from biased coins
- Hint 1. Look at $\prod_k\big((1-p_k)-p_k\big)$. What does it measure?
- Hint 2. The product telescopes.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $\dfrac{n}{2n+1}$
Key idea: the expected value of $(-1)^{\#\text{heads}}$ is a product, and here it telescopes.
Let $p_k=\frac1{2k+1}$ and let $H$ be the number of heads. The coins are independent, so $$E\big[(-1)^H\big]=\prod_{k=1}^n\big((1-p_k)-p_k\big)=\prod_{k=1}^n\frac{2k-1}{2k+1}=\frac1{2n+1}.$$ On the other hand $E[(-1)^H]=P(\text{even})-P(\text{odd})=1-2P(\text{odd})$. Therefore $$P(\text{odd})=\frac12\Big(1-\frac1{2n+1}\Big)=\frac{n}{2n+1}.$$
How we checked it: script: exact enumeration with fractions for n = 1..7
A3 Algebra: when a quartic factors over the integers
- Hint 1. Solve for $x^2$. The discriminant is a nice multiple of $m$.
- Hint 2. The roots are $\pm\sqrt m\pm\sqrt2$. A factor of degree 2 picks two of them.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $m$ is a perfect square or twice a perfect square ($m=k^2$ or $m=2k^2$, $k\ge0$)
Key idea: the four roots are $\pm\sqrt m\pm\sqrt2$, and a quadratic factor with integer coefficients must pair them in a way that makes its coefficients integers.
The roots. As a quadratic in $x^2$, the discriminant is $(m+2)^2-(m-2)^2=8m$, so $$x^2=m+2\pm2\sqrt{2m}=(\sqrt m\pm\sqrt2)^2 ,$$ and the roots are $\pm\sqrt m\pm\sqrt2$ (all four sign choices; for $m<0$, $\sqrt m$ is imaginary).
Sufficiency.
- If $m=k^2$: $P_m=\big(x^2-2kx+k^2-2\big)\big(x^2+2kx+k^2-2\big)$, pairing $k\pm\sqrt2$ and $-k\pm\sqrt2$.
- If $m=2k^2$: $P_m=\big(x^2-2(k+1)^2\big)\big(x^2-2(k-1)^2\big)$, since $\sqrt m\pm\sqrt2=(k\pm1)\sqrt2$.
Necessity. A factorization into nonconstant integer polynomials has a factor of degree $1$ or $2$.
- Degree $1$ means a rational root $q=\varepsilon\sqrt2\pm\sqrt m$ with $\varepsilon=\pm1$. Then $(q-\varepsilon\sqrt2)^2=m$ gives $q^2+2-m=2\varepsilon q\sqrt2$, so $q=0$ and $m=2$, which is twice a square.
- Degree $2$ means a monic integer quadratic whose roots are two of the four. Pairing $r$ with $-r$ gives $x^2-r^2$ with $r^2=m+2\pm2\sqrt{2m}$, an integer only if $\sqrt{2m}$ is rational, so $2m$ is a perfect square and $m=2k^2$. Pairing $\sqrt m+\sqrt2$ with $\sqrt m-\sqrt2$ (or the negatives) gives the sum $\pm2\sqrt m$, an integer only if $m$ is a perfect square. Pairing $\sqrt2+\sqrt m$ with $\sqrt2-\sqrt m$ (or the negatives) gives the sum $\pm2\sqrt2$, never an integer.
So $P_m$ factors exactly when $m$ is a square or twice a square (this includes $m=0$ and $m=2$; negative $m$ never work).
How we checked it: script: sympy factored P_m for -30 β€ m β€ 100; it splits exactly for 0,1,2,4,8,9,16,18,25,β¦
A4 Geometry: three cevians bisecting each other in a cycle
- Hint 1. Put $A$ at the origin and use vectors. Write each point on a side with one ratio.
- Hint 2. Each bisecting condition gives one equation; the three equations are the same up to a cyclic shift, and they force the three ratios to be equal.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $\dfrac{7-3\sqrt5}{4}$
Key idea: each condition is one equation in the side ratios; a monotonicity argument makes the three ratios equal, and the area is a $3\times3$ determinant in barycentric coordinates.
Set up. Use vectors with $A$ at the origin, $B=\mathbf b$, $C=\mathbf c$. Write $$E=(1-e)\mathbf b+e\,\mathbf c,\qquad F=(1-f)\,\mathbf c,\qquad G=g\,\mathbf b,$$ so $e=BE/BC$, $f=CF/CA$, $g=AG/AB$, all in $(0,1)$.
One condition. $R$ is the midpoint of $BF$: $R=\tfrac12\mathbf b+\tfrac{1-f}2\mathbf c$. It lies on line $AE$ exactly when its coefficients are proportional to those of $E$: $\frac{1-f}{2}(1-e)=\frac12e$, i.e. $(1-e)(1-f)=e$. Relabeling $A\to B\to C\to A$ moves $e\to f\to g$, so the other two conditions are $(1-f)(1-g)=f$ and $(1-g)(1-e)=g$.
Solve. The first equation says $e=\varphi(f)$ with $\varphi(x)=\frac{1-x}{2-x}$, and similarly $f=\varphi(g)$, $g=\varphi(e)$. So $e=\varphi(\varphi(\varphi(e)))$. The function $\varphi$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,1]$, so $\varphi\circ\varphi\circ\varphi$ is strictly decreasing too, and the equation $x=\varphi^3(x)$ has at most one solution. The fixed point of $\varphi$ is one: $x=\frac{1-x}{2-x}$ gives $x^2-3x+1=0$, so $x=\frac{3-\sqrt5}2$. Hence $e=f=g=x$ with $x^2=3x-1$.
Area. In barycentric coordinates with respect to $A,B,C$ (weights summing to $1$): $$R=\Big(\tfrac x2,\tfrac12,\tfrac{1-x}2\Big),\quad S=\Big(\tfrac{1-x}2,\tfrac x2,\tfrac12\Big),\quad T=\Big(\tfrac12,\tfrac{1-x}2,\tfrac x2\Big)$$ ($S$ and $T$ follow from $R$ by the cyclic relabeling). The area of $RST$ divided by the area of $ABC$ is the absolute value of the determinant of these rows. It is $\tfrac18$ times the circulant determinant of $(x,1,1-x)$, and a circulant $(p,q,r)$ has determinant $p^3+q^3+r^3-3pqr$: $$x^3+1+(1-x)^3-3x(1-x)=6x^2-6x+2=12x-4=14-6\sqrt5 .$$ Since $[ABC]=1$, the area of $RST$ is $\frac{14-6\sqrt5}8=\frac{7-3\sqrt5}4\approx0.073$.
How we checked it: script: sympy solved the three midpoint-on-line conditions in coordinates; the only solution in the triangle gives area (7β3β5)/4
A5 Number theory: an exponential equation equal to 2001
- Hint 1. Reduce mod $a$ and mod $a+1$. Both give strong conditions on $a$.
- Hint 2. For the few candidates left, reduce mod $3$ or mod $8$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $a=13,\ n=2$
Key idea: reducing modulo $a$ and $a+1$ leaves only three values of $a$; small moduli then pin down $n$.
Note $13^3-14^2=2197-196=2001$, so $(a,n)=(13,2)$ works. We show it is the only pair.
Mod $a$. $(a+1)^n\equiv1$, so $a^{n+1}-(a+1)^n\equiv-1$. Hence $2001\equiv-1\pmod a$, i.e. $a\mid2002=2\cdot7\cdot11\cdot13$.
Mod $a+1$. $a\equiv-1$, so $(-1)^{n+1}\equiv2001\pmod{a+1}$, i.e. $a+1$ divides $2000$ or $2002$.
Checking the sixteen divisors $a$ of $2002$, the only ones with $a+1\mid2000$ or $a+1\mid2002$ are $a=1$ ($a+1=2$), $a=7$ ($a+1=8\mid2000$) and $a=13$ ($a+1=14\mid2002$).
- $a=1$: $1-2^n=2001$ is impossible.
- $a=7$: mod $8$, $(-1)^{n+1}\equiv2001\equiv1$, so $n$ is odd. Mod $3$, $7\equiv1$ and $8\equiv2$, so $1-2^n\equiv2001\equiv0$, i.e. $2^n\equiv1\pmod 3$, so $n$ is even. Contradiction.
- $a=13$: mod $14$, $(-1)^{n+1}\equiv2001\equiv-1$, so $n$ is even. Mod $8$: $13\equiv5$, and $5^{n+1}\equiv5$ for even $n$; if $n\ge3$ then $14^n\equiv0\pmod8$, giving $5\equiv2001\equiv1\pmod 8$, false. So $n\le2$, and $n$ even means $n=2$.
Hence $(a,n)=(13,2)$ is the unique solution.
How we checked it: script: search over a < 3000, n < 40 finds only (13, 2)
A6 Calculus: a long parabolic arc inside a unit circle
- Hint 1. Use a very narrow parabola with its vertex at the bottom of the circle. Roughly, it runs up and back down a diameter.
- Hint 2. Compare $\sqrt{1+t^2}$ with $t$: the difference is $\frac1{\sqrt{1+t^2}+t}$, which is at least $\frac1{1+2t}$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: Yes
Key idea: a narrow parabola runs almost up a diameter and back, for length almost $4$; a careful estimate shows the small sideways wiggle adds more than the arc falls short at the top.
Take the unit circle centered at the origin and the parabola $y=ax^2-1$ with $a$ large. Substituting into $x^2+y^2=1$ gives $x^2\big(a^2x^2-(2a-1)\big)=0$, so the parabola is inside the circle for $|x|\le x_0$, where $x_0=\frac{\sqrt{2a-1}}a$. At the ends, $y=ax_0^2-1=1-\frac1a$.
The length of this arc is $$L=2\int_0^{x_0}\sqrt{1+4a^2x^2}\,dx .$$ For $t\ge0$, $\sqrt{1+t^2}-t=\frac1{\sqrt{1+t^2}+t}\ge\frac1{1+2t}$, because $\sqrt{1+t^2}\le1+t$. With $t=2ax$, $$L\ge2\int_0^{x_0}2ax\,dx+2\int_0^{x_0}\frac{dx}{1+4ax}=2ax_0^2+\frac{\ln(1+4ax_0)}{2a}=4-\frac2a+\frac{\ln\big(1+4\sqrt{2a-1}\big)}{2a}.$$ So $L>4$ as soon as $\ln(1+4\sqrt{2a-1})>4$, i.e. $1+4\sqrt{2a-1}>e^4\approx54.6$. This holds for $a=100$, where the bound gives $L>4.0002$ (a numerical integration gives $L\approx4.0027$).
The vertex $(0,-1)$ and the two ends lie on the circle. If the arc must lie strictly inside, shrink the picture by a factor $1-\varepsilon$ about the center: it is still a parabolic arc, now strictly inside, and its length $(1-\varepsilon)L$ is still above $4$ for small $\varepsilon$.
So the answer is yes.
How we checked it: script: numerical arc lengths for a = 50, 90, 100, 200, 1000 are all above 4 (about 4.0018 to 4.0027)
B1 Combinatorics: balanced coloring of a numbered grid
- Hint 1. Split each entry into a row part and a column part.
Our solution (not official)
Key idea: each entry is a row part plus a column part, and the coloring is balanced in every row and every column.
The entry in row $k$, column $j$ is $(k-1)n+j$. Sum it over the red squares in two pieces.
- Row parts. Each row has $n/2$ red squares, so the red row parts add up to $\sum_k\frac n2(k-1)n$. The same count holds for black.
- Column parts. Each column has $n/2$ red squares, so the red column parts add up to $\sum_j\frac n2\,j$. Again the same for black.
So the red total equals the black total.
How we checked it: proof only
B2 Algebra: a system that hides two fifth powers
- Hint 1. Add and subtract the two equations, then multiply by $x$ or by $y$.
- Hint 2. Compare with the binomial expansion of $(x\pm y)^5$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $x=\dfrac{\sqrt[5]3+1}{2},\ y=\dfrac{\sqrt[5]3-1}{2}$
Key idea: adding and subtracting the equations, then clearing denominators, gives exactly the two halves of $(x+y)^5$ and $(x-y)^5$.
Note $x,y\ne0$. The right sides are $3x^4+10x^2y^2+3y^4$ and $2y^4-2x^4$.
- Adding: $\frac2x=x^4+10x^2y^2+5y^4$, so $x^5+10x^3y^2+5xy^4=2$.
- Subtracting: $\frac1y=5x^4+10x^2y^2+y^4$, so $5x^4y+10x^2y^3+y^5=1$.
These are the odd-in-$y$ and even-in-$y$ halves of the binomial expansion: $$(x+y)^5=2+1=3,\qquad (x-y)^5=2-1=1 .$$ So $x+y=\sqrt[5]3$ and $x-y=1$, giving the single real pair $$x=\frac{\sqrt[5]3+1}2,\qquad y=\frac{\sqrt[5]3-1}2 .$$ Both are nonzero, and each step reverses (we only multiplied by the nonzero $x$ or $y$), so this pair does solve the system.
How we checked it: script: substituting the pair into both equations gives residuals below 2e-15
B3 Series: grouping terms by the nearest integer to a root
- Hint 1. For which $n$ is the nearest integer to $\sqrt n$ equal to $k$?
- Hint 2. After grouping, the sum telescopes.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $3$
Key idea: group the terms by the value $k$ of the nearest integer; each group is a short geometric sum, and the total telescopes.
The nearest integer to $\sqrt n$ is $k$ exactly when $k-\tfrac12<\sqrt n<k+\tfrac12$, i.e. $k^2-k+\tfrac14<n<k^2+k+\tfrac14$, i.e. $k^2-k+1\le n\le k^2+k$. (No $\sqrt n$ is ever a half-integer.) So $$\sum_{n\ge1}\frac{2^{\langle n\rangle}+2^{-\langle n\rangle}}{2^n}=\sum_{k\ge1}\big(2^k+2^{-k}\big)\sum_{n=k^2-k+1}^{k^2+k}2^{-n}=\sum_{k\ge1}\big(2^k+2^{-k}\big)\big(2^{-(k^2-k)}-2^{-(k^2+k)}\big).$$ Expanding the product, the two middle terms cancel: $$2^{-k^2+2k}-2^{-k^2-2k}=2\big(2^{-(k-1)^2}-2^{-(k+1)^2}\big).$$ Summing over $k\ge1$, everything cancels except the first two positive terms: $$2\big(2^{0}+2^{-1}\big)=3 .$$
How we checked it: script: the first 200 terms sum to 3.0 in floating point
B4 Number theory: iterating x minus 1/x on rationals
- Hint 1. Write $x=p/q$ in lowest terms. Is $\frac{p^2-q^2}{pq}$ in lowest terms?
- Hint 2. Find a size measure on rationals that strictly increases under $f$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: True: the intersection is empty
Key idea: the “height” $|p|+|q|$ of a fraction strictly increases under $f$, so each rational can be reached by only boundedly many steps.
For a rational $x=p/q$ in lowest terms ($q\ge1$), let $h(x)=|p|+|q|$.
$f$ in lowest terms. $f(p/q)=\frac{p^2-q^2}{pq}$. A prime dividing $pq$ divides $p$ or $q$, but not both; then it does not divide $p^2-q^2$. So this fraction is in lowest terms (up to the sign of the denominator), and $$h(f(x))=|p^2-q^2|+|pq| .$$
$h$ grows. For $x\in S$ we have $p\ne0$ and $|p|\ne|q|$. So $|p^2-q^2|=\big||p|-|q|\big|\,(|p|+|q|)\ge|p|+|q|$, and $|pq|\ge1$. Hence $h(f(x))\ge h(x)+1$.
Conclusion. If $y\in f^{(n)}(S)$, then $y=f^{(n)}(x)$ for some $x\in S$, and $h(y)\ge h(x)+n>n$. So a given rational $y$ is not in $f^{(n)}(S)$ once $n\ge h(y)$. No rational lies in every $f^{(n)}(S)$: the intersection is empty, and the statement is true.
How we checked it: script: h(f(x)) > h(x) checked for all p/q with |p| β€ 30, q β€ 30
B5 Functional equation: a continuous g with linear second iterate
- Hint 1. Show $g$ is injective, hence monotone, and then onto. So every orbit $g^n(x)$ is defined for all integers $n$.
- Hint 2. Along an orbit, $x_{n+2}=ax_{n+1}+bx_n$. Compare the two roots of $t^2-at-b$: one positive, one negative and smaller in size.
Our solution (not official)
Key idea: along each orbit the values satisfy a linear recurrence. Monotonicity of $g$ forbids one of the two exponential modes, and what remains is $g(x)=cx$.
$g$ is a bijection. If $g(x)=g(y)$, then $bx=g(g(x))-ag(x)=by$, so $x=y$. A continuous injective function on $\mathbb R$ is strictly monotone.
- If $g$ is increasing and had a finite limit $L$ at $+\infty$, then $g(g(x))\to g(L)$ while $ag(x)+bx\to+\infty$. So $g\to+\infty$ at $+\infty$; similarly $g\to-\infty$ at $-\infty$.
- If $g$ is decreasing, the same argument gives $g\to\mp\infty$ at $\pm\infty$.
Either way $g$ is onto, so $g^{-1}$ exists and orbits $x_n=g^n(x)$ make sense for all $n\in\mathbb Z$.
The recurrence. Applying the equation at $x_n$ gives $x_{n+2}=ax_{n+1}+bx_n$ for every integer $n$. The roots of $t^2-at-b$ are $$r_1=\frac{a+\sqrt{a^2+4b}}2>0,\qquad r_2=\frac{a-\sqrt{a^2+4b}}2<0,$$ and $|r_2|<r_1$ because $r_1+r_2=a>0$. So for all $n\in\mathbb Z$, $x_n=c_1r_1^n+c_2r_2^n$, with $c_1,c_2$ fixed by $x_0=x$ and $x_1=g(x)$. The differences are $$d_n=x_{n+1}-x_n=c_1(r_1-1)r_1^n+c_2(r_2-1)r_2^n .$$ Here $r_2-1\ne0$, and $r_1\ne1$ because $1-a-b>0$. If $x_1=x_0$ then $x$ is a fixed point, so $x=ax+bx$ and $x=0$. Otherwise all $d_n\ne0$.
Increasing $g$. Then the orbit is monotone: all $d_n$ have the same sign. As $n\to-\infty$, $|r_2|^n$ beats $r_1^n$ (since $|r_2|<r_1$), so if $c_2\ne0$ the sign of $d_n$ would alternate. Thus $c_2=0$, and $g(x)=x_1=r_1x_0=r_1x$.
Decreasing $g$. Then $d_n$ and $d_{n+1}$ always have opposite signs. As $n\to+\infty$, $r_1^n$ beats $|r_2|^n$, so if $c_1\ne0$ the sign of $d_n$ would eventually be constant. Thus $c_1=0$ and $g(x)=r_2x$.
Each case covers every $x$ (including $x=0$, where $g(0)=0$), so $g(x)=cx$ with $c=r_1$ or $c=r_2$.
How we checked it: proof only
B6 Sequences: local concavity of a sublinear increasing sequence
- Hint 1. Tilt the picture: look at $a_k-ck$ for a small slope $c>0$.
- Hint 2. Take the last index where $a_k-ck$ is largest. What does that say about $a_{n-i}+a_{n+i}$?
Our solution (not official)
Answer: Yes
Key idea: subtract a line of small slope $c$ and take the last place where the result is largest; that index has the required property, and as $c\to0$ these indices go to infinity.
We read “increasing” as strictly increasing. (If equal neighbors were allowed, a sequence that is eventually constant would be a counterexample.)
Fix $c>0$. Since $a_k/k\to0$, we have $a_k-ck\to-\infty$, so $a_k-ck$ has a largest value over $k\ge1$. Let $n=n(c)$ be the largest index where it is attained. For $1\le i\le n-1$: $$a_{n+i}-c(n+i)<a_n-cn\quad(\text{strict: }n\text{ is the last maximum}),\qquad a_{n-i}-c(n-i)\le a_n-cn .$$ Adding, the $c$ terms cancel and $a_{n-i}+a_{n+i}<2a_n$. So every $n(c)$ works.
Infinitely many. Suppose all $n(c)$ for $c$ in some sequence $c\to0$ were at most $M$. For each such $c$ and every $k$, $a_k-ck\le a_{n(c)}-c\,n(c)\le a_M$. Letting $c\to0$ gives $a_k\le a_M$ for all $k$, contradicting $a_{M+1}>a_M$. So $n(c)\to\infty$ as $c\to0$, and infinitely many $n$ have the property.
How we checked it: proof only