Putnam 1991
Read the problems at the official link. The 1991 Putnam problems are Β© the Mathematical Association of America, so we don't reproduce them here. Open the 1991 problems (PDF) from the Putnam Archive.
The topic labels, hints and solutions below are our own, written from scratch: our solutions, not official ones. If you spot a mistake, please use βReport a problemβ at the bottom of the page.
A1 Geometry: area under the path of a rolling rectangle
- Hint 1. During each quarter turn, the tracked point moves on a quarter circle around the pivot.
- Hint 2. Split the area under each arc into a quarter disk and two right triangles.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $6+\dfrac{7\pi}{2}$
Key idea: the path is four quarter circles, and the region under each one is a quarter disk plus two right triangles with a corner at the pivot.
A quarter turn clockwise about a pivot $Q$ sends the offset $(u,v)$ from $Q$ to $(v,-u)$. Following the point that starts at $(1,1)$:
| pivot | start | end | radius$^2$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| $(2,0)$ | $(1,1)$ | $(3,1)$ | $2$ |
| $(5,0)$ | $(3,1)$ | $(6,2)$ | $5$ |
| $(7,0)$ | $(6,2)$ | $(9,1)$ | $5$ |
| $(10,0)$ | $(9,1)$ | $(11,1)$ | $2$ |
Each arc sweeps a quarter turn around its pivot, from a start point on one side of the pivot to an end point on the other. So the region under that arc, down to the $x$-axis, is the quarter disk swept by the radius, plus the right triangle between the pivot, the start point and its foot on the axis, plus the same for the end point.
- Arc 1: quarter disk $\frac{2\pi}4$; triangles $\frac12\cdot1\cdot1$ twice. Total $\frac\pi2+1$.
- Arc 2: quarter disk $\frac{5\pi}4$; triangles with legs $2,1$ and $1,2$. Total $\frac{5\pi}4+2$.
- Arc 3: the same as arc 2: $\frac{5\pi}4+2$.
- Arc 4: the same as arc 1: $\frac\pi2+1$.
Adding up, the area is $$6+\Big(\frac12+\frac54+\frac54+\frac12\Big)\pi=6+\frac{7\pi}2 .$$
How we checked it: script: traced the path numerically and integrated: 16.99557 = 6 + 7Ο/2
A2 Linear algebra: a factorization that forces singularity
- Hint 1. Multiply $A^2+B^2$ by $A-B$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: No
Key idea: $(A^2+B^2)(A-B)=0$ while $A-B\ne0$.
Expand, keeping the order of factors: $$(A^2+B^2)(A-B)=A^3-A^2B+B^2A-B^3 .$$ The hypotheses say $A^3=B^3$ and $A^2B=B^2A$, so this is $0$. If $A^2+B^2$ were invertible, multiplying on the left by its inverse would give $A-B=0$, contradicting $A\ne B$. So $A^2+B^2$ is never invertible.
How we checked it: algebra checked by hand
A3 Polynomials: critical points exactly at root midpoints
- Hint 1. Use the logarithmic derivative $\frac{p'}{p}=\sum_j\frac1{x-r_j}$.
- Hint 2. At the midpoint of the first two roots, the two nearest terms cancel. What sign do the others have?
Our solution (not official)
Answer: Exactly the quadratics with two distinct real roots
Key idea: at the midpoint of the two smallest roots, the two nearest terms of $p'/p$ cancel, and any further root contributes a term of a single sign.
Since $p$ has degree $n$ and $n$ distinct real roots, $p(x)=c\prod_{j=1}^n(x-r_j)$, and away from the roots $$\frac{p'(x)}{p(x)}=\sum_{j=1}^n\frac1{x-r_j}.$$ Let $m=\frac{r_1+r_2}2$. It is not a root, so $p'(m)=0$ means the sum is $0$ at $m$. The terms for $j=1,2$ are $\frac2{r_2-r_1}$ and $-\frac2{r_2-r_1}$, which cancel. Every other root has $r_j>r_2>m$, so its term $\frac1{m-r_j}$ is negative. A sum of negative terms is zero only if there are none, so $n=2$.
Conversely, for $n=2$, $p=c(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$ has $p'(x)=c(2x-r_1-r_2)$, which vanishes at the midpoint. So the answer is all $p(x)=c(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$ with $c\ne0$ and $r_1<r_2$ real.
How we checked it: proof only
A4 Geometry: small discs that meet every line
- Hint 1. A line at distance $\rho$ from the origin crosses every circle of radius $R\ge\rho$ about the origin.
- Hint 2. Put many tiny discs, evenly spaced, on circles of radius $k=1,2,3,\dots$, with fewer and fewer total area.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: Yes
Key idea: a ring of $N$ evenly spaced discs on a circle of radius $R$ catches every line closer than $R$ to the origin if their radius is about $\pi R/N$; the ring’s total area is then about $\pi^3R^2/N$, which we can make summable.
One ring. Put $N$ points $c_j=R(\cos\theta_j,\sin\theta_j)$ on the circle of radius $R$, at angles spaced $\frac{2\pi}N$ apart, and give each a disc of radius $r=\frac{\pi R}N$. Take a line at distance $\rho\le R$ from the origin, with unit normal $(\cos\varphi,\sin\varphi)$. A point $c$ is at distance $|c\cdot(\cos\varphi,\sin\varphi)-\rho|$ from the line. As $\theta$ varies, $R\cos(\theta-\varphi)$ takes every value in $[-R,R]$, so it equals $\rho$ for some angle $\theta^*$. Some $\theta_j$ is within $\frac\pi N$ of $\theta^*$, and $R\cos(\cdot-\varphi)$ changes by at most $R$ times the change in angle, so $$\big|c_j\cdot(\cos\varphi,\sin\varphi)-\rho\big|\le\frac{\pi R}N=r .$$ So the line meets the disc around $c_j$.
All rings. For $k=1,2,3,\dots$ use a ring with $R=k$ and $N=k^4$. Every line is at some finite distance $\rho$ from the origin, so the ring with $k\ge\rho$ catches it. The total area is $$\sum_k k^4\cdot\pi\Big(\frac{\pi k}{k^4}\Big)^2=\sum_k\frac{\pi^3}{k^2}<\infty .$$ Each ring has finitely many centers, and the rings move off to infinity, so the centers have no limit point in the plane. So such discs exist.
How we checked it: proof only; the one-ring estimate was spot-checked with random lines
A5 Integrals: bounding an arc-length-style integral
- Hint 1. Use $\sqrt{u^2+v^2}\le u+v$ for $u,v\ge0$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $\dfrac13$ (at $y=1$)
Key idea: bound the square root by the sum of the two square roots; the resulting cubic in $y$ peaks at $y=1$, where the bound is exact.
For $u,v\ge0$, $\sqrt{u^2+v^2}\le u+v$. With $u=x^2$ and $v=y-y^2\ge0$: $$\int_0^y\sqrt{x^4+(y-y^2)^2}\,dx\le\int_0^y\big(x^2+y-y^2\big)dx=\frac{y^3}3+y^2-y^3=y^2-\frac{2y^3}3 .$$ The right side has derivative $2y(1-y)\ge0$ on $[0,1]$, so it is at most its value at $y=1$, which is $\frac13$.
At $y=1$ the integral is $\int_0^1x^2\,dx=\frac13$. So the maximum is $\frac13$.
How we checked it: script: numerical values at y = 0.5, 0.9, 1 are 0.136, 0.272, 0.3333
A6 Partitions: a Fibonacci-like sequence of parts
- Hint 1. Measure the slack in each condition: $d_i=a_i-a_{i+1}-a_{i+2}$, with $a_{r+1}=a_{r+2}=0$.
- Hint 2. Write $n=\sum a_i$ in terms of the $d_j$. The coefficients are $1,2,4,7,12,\dots$
Our solution (not official)
Key idea: the slacks $d_j$ in the inequalities are arbitrary positive integers, and $n=\sum_jd_jg_j$. Reading $d_j$ as the number of parts equal to $g_j$ gives the bijection.
Slacks. Given a sum $a_1+\dots+a_r$ of the first kind, set $a_{r+1}=a_{r+2}=0$ and $$d_i=a_i-a_{i+1}-a_{i+2}\qquad(1\le i\le r).$$ The conditions say exactly that $d_1,\dots,d_r$ are positive integers ($d_{r-1}=a_{r-1}-a_r$ and $d_r=a_r$). Conversely, any positive integers $d_1,\dots,d_r$ determine $a_r,a_{r-1},\dots,a_1$ in turn by $a_i=d_i+a_{i+1}+a_{i+2}$, and these satisfy the conditions. So sums of the first kind with $r$ terms correspond one-to-one to $r$-tuples of positive integers.
The total. Unwinding the recursion, $a_i=\sum_{j\ge i}F_{j-i+1}d_j$, where $F_1=F_2=1,F_3=2,\dots$ are the Fibonacci numbers. (Check: $d_r$ enters $a_r,a_{r-1},a_{r-2},\dots$ with weights $1,1,2,3,\dots$, since the weights obey the same recursion.) Summing over $i$, the coefficient of $d_j$ in $n$ is $$F_1+F_2+\dots+F_j=F_{j+2}-1 .$$ The numbers $F_{j+2}-1$ are $1,2,4,7,12,\dots$ and satisfy $G_j=G_{j-1}+G_{j-2}+1$, so they are exactly the $g_j$. Hence $$n=\sum_{j=1}^r d_j\,g_j .$$
The bijection. A sum of the second kind with largest part $g_r$ is the same as a choice of multiplicities $d_1,\dots,d_r$ of the parts $g_1,\dots,g_r$, all at least $1$, with $\sum d_jg_j=n$. So both kinds of sums correspond to the same set of tuples $(r;d_1,\dots,d_r)$, and $A(n)=B(n)$.
How we checked it: script: computed A(n) and B(n) by brute force for n β€ 15; they agree (1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 5, 5, 7, 7, 10, 10, 13, 14, 18)
B1 Number theory: adding the excess over a square
- Hint 1. If $a=m^2+s$ with $0<s\le2m$, where can $a+s$ lie relative to the next squares?
Our solution (not official)
Answer: Exactly when $A$ is a perfect square
Key idea: a non-square never becomes a square after one step, so the sequence keeps growing.
If $A=m^2$, then $S(A)=0$ and the sequence is constant.
Now let $a$ be a non-square: $a=m^2+s$ with $1\le s\le2m$. The next term is $a+s=m^2+2s$, and $$m^2<m^2+2s\le m^2+4m<(m+2)^2 .$$ So it is a square only if $m^2+2s=(m+1)^2$, i.e. $2s=2m+1$, which is impossible by parity. Hence a non-square always leads to a non-square, $S(a_k)\ge1$ for every $k$, and the sequence increases forever.
The sequence is eventually constant exactly when $A$ is a perfect square.
How we checked it: script: ran the sequence 40 steps for A < 300; it settles only for squares
B2 Functional equations: complex exponential in disguise
- Hint 1. Look at $h=f+ig$. What does $h(x+y)$ equal?
- Hint 2. Show $|h|^2$ has derivative $0$.
Our solution (not official)
Key idea: $h=f+ig$ satisfies $h(x+y)=h(x)h(y)$, and $f'(0)=0$ makes $h'(0)$ purely imaginary, so $|h|$ cannot change.
Let $h=f+ig$. The two equations are the real and imaginary parts of $$h(x+y)=h(x)\,h(y).$$ $h(0)=1$. From $h(0)=h(0)^2$, $h(0)\in\{0,1\}$. If $h(0)=0$ then $h(x)=h(x)h(0)=0$ for all $x$, so $f$ and $g$ are constant, which is excluded. So $h(0)=1$.
Derivative. Differentiating $h(x+y)=h(x)h(y)$ in $y$ at $y=0$ gives $h'(x)=h(x)\,h'(0)$. Here $h'(0)=f'(0)+ig'(0)=i\kappa$ with $\kappa=g'(0)$ real. Then $$\frac{d}{dx}|h|^2=2\operatorname{Re}\big(\overline{h}\,h'\big)=2\operatorname{Re}\big(i\kappa|h|^2\big)=0 .$$ So $f^2+g^2=|h|^2$ is constant, equal to $|h(0)|^2=1$.
How we checked it: proof only
B3 Tiling: large rectangles from two brick sizes
- Hint 1. Find strip heights that can be filled for every large width, using one brick type per column.
- Hint 2. Heights $20$, $28$ and $35$ work, and they have greatest common divisor $1$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: Yes (for example $L=197$ works)
Key idea: stack identical bricks into columns to make strips of heights $20$, $28$, $35$ that fit every width $n\ge30$; these heights combine to every $m\ge198$.
Strips. A strip of height $h$ can be filled with columns, each made of identical bricks stacked in the same orientation:
| height | column of⦠| column width |
|---|---|---|
| $20$ | five $4\times6$ (height $4$) / four $5\times7$ (height $5$) | $6$ / $7$ |
| $28$ | seven $4\times6$ (height $4$) / four $5\times7$ (height $7$) | $6$ / $5$ |
| $35$ | seven $5\times7$ (height $5$) / five $5\times7$ (height $7$) | $7$ / $5$ |
So a strip of height $20$ can have any width $6x+7y$, which covers every integer $\ge30$ (the largest gap of $6,7$ is $6\cdot7-6-7=29$). Height $28$ allows every width $5x+6y\ge20$, and height $35$ every width $5x+7y\ge24$. Hence for $n\ge30$, strips of all three heights can be made with width $n$.
Stacking strips. Now stack strips to reach height $m$. Since $\gcd(20,28,35)=1$, every large $m$ is $20u+28v+35w$ with $u,v,w\ge0$; a direct check shows the largest exception is $197$.
So whenever $m,n>197$, the $m\times n$ rectangle can be tiled. Such an $L$ exists.
How we checked it: script: the largest integer not of the form 20u + 28v + 35w is 197; the gaps 29, 19, 23 for the widths were computed too
B4 Number theory: a binomial sum modulo a prime squared
- Hint 1. For $0<j<p$, $p$ divides $\binom pj$, and $\binom{p+j}j\equiv1\pmod p$.
- Hint 2. Treat $j=p$ separately: why is $\binom{2p}{p}\equiv2\pmod{p^2}$?
Our solution (not official)
Key idea: for $0<j<p$ each term is $\binom pj$ modulo $p^2$, and the last term $\binom{2p}p$ is $2$ modulo $p^2$.
Middle terms. For $0<j<p$, $\binom pj=p\,u_j$ for an integer $u_j$. Also $$\binom{p+j}{j}=\prod_{k=1}^j\frac{p+k}k$$ is an integer, and modulo $p$ each factor $p+k\equiv k$ with $k$ invertible, so $\binom{p+j}j\equiv1\pmod p$. Write it as $1+p\,v_j$. Then $$\binom pj\binom{p+j}j=p\,u_j(1+p\,v_j)\equiv p\,u_j=\binom pj\pmod{p^2}.$$
End terms. $j=0$ gives $1$. For $j=p$, the term is $\binom{2p}p$. By Vandermonde, $$\binom{2p}p=\sum_{k=0}^p\binom pk^2=2+\sum_{k=1}^{p-1}\binom pk^2\equiv2\pmod{p^2},$$ since each $\binom pk$ with $0<k<p$ is divisible by $p$.
Total. $$\sum_{j=0}^p\binom pj\binom{p+j}j\equiv1+\sum_{j=1}^{p-1}\binom pj+2=1+(2^p-2)+2=2^p+1\pmod{p^2}.$$
How we checked it: script: exact check for p = 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17
B5 Finite fields: squares that are one more than squares
- Hint 1. Count the solutions of $x^2-y^2=1$ in two ways.
- Hint 2. How many pairs $(x,y)$ give the same common value $x^2=y^2+1$?
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $\dfrac{p+3}{4}$ if $p\equiv1\pmod4$; $\dfrac{p+1}{4}$ if $p\equiv3\pmod4$
Key idea: the curve $x^2-y^2=1$ has exactly $p-1$ points, and each common value corresponds to $4$ of them, except for the special values $0$ and $1$.
Points on the curve. Since $p$ is odd, $(x-y)(x+y)=1$ is equivalent to $x-y=u$, $x+y=u^{-1}$ for some $u\ne0$, which determines $(x,y)$. So there are $p-1$ solutions.
Grouping by value. A value $c$ is in the intersection exactly when $c=x^2=y^2+1$ for some $(x,y)$ on the curve.
- If $c\ne0,1$: then $x\ne0$ and $y\ne0$, and the solutions with this value are $(\pm x,\pm y)$, four of them.
- $c=1$: $x=\pm1$, $y=0$: two solutions. And $1$ is always in the intersection.
- $c=0$: needs $y^2=-1$. This happens when $-1$ is a square, i.e. $p\equiv1\pmod4$, and then gives two solutions $(0,\pm y)$.
Let $N'$ be the number of values other than $0,1$.
- $p\equiv1\pmod4$: $4N'+2+2=p-1$, so $N'=\frac{p-5}4$, and the answer is $N'+2=\frac{p+3}4$.
- $p\equiv3\pmod4$: $4N'+2=p-1$, so $N'=\frac{p-3}4$, and the answer is $N'+1=\frac{p+1}4$.
How we checked it: script: brute force for all primes 3 β€ p β€ 29
B6 Inequalities: geometric interpolation against hyperbolic interpolation
- Hint 1. Treat both sides as functions of $x$ on $[0,1]$. Each one solves an equation of the form $y''=\text{const}\cdot y$, and they agree at $x=0$ and $x=1$.
- Hint 2. Let $k=\ln(a/b)$. Look at the difference of the two sides and compare $u^2$ with $k^2$.
Our solution (not official)
Answer: $c=\left|\ln\dfrac ab\right|$
Key idea: the two sides solve $y''=k^2y$ and $y''=u^2y$ with the same end values, where $k=\ln(a/b)$. A maximum-principle argument shows which one lies on top, and that depends only on whether $u^2$ is above or below $k^2$.
Let $k=\ln(a/b)$ and fix $u\ne0$. For $0\le x\le1$ put $$\psi(x)=a^xb^{1-x}=b\,e^{kx},\qquad \varphi(x)=\frac{a\sinh(ux)+b\sinh\big(u(1-x)\big)}{\sinh u}.$$ Then $\psi''=k^2\psi$ and $\varphi''=u^2\varphi$. Both functions equal $b$ at $x=0$ and $a$ at $x=1$. The inequality says that $D=\varphi-\psi$ is $\ge0$ on $(0,1)$. We know $D(0)=D(1)=0$, and $$D''-u^2D=\big(\varphi''-u^2\varphi\big)-\big(\psi''-u^2\psi\big)=(u^2-k^2)\,\psi .$$ Note that $\psi>0$ everywhere.
If $u^2\le k^2$, the inequality holds. Here $D''-u^2D\le0$. Suppose $D$ is negative somewhere. Since $D$ is $0$ at both ends, its minimum over $[0,1]$ is negative and occurs at an interior point $x_0$, where $D''(x_0)\ge0$. Then $D''(x_0)-u^2D(x_0)>0$, which is a contradiction. So $D\ge0$.
If $u^2>k^2$, the inequality fails. Here $D''-u^2D>0$ everywhere. Suppose $D\ge0$ on all of $[0,1]$. $D$ cannot be identically $0$, since then $D''-u^2D=0$. So $D$ has a positive maximum at an interior point $x_0$, where $D''(x_0)\le0$, and then $D''(x_0)-u^2D(x_0)<0$. That is a contradiction, so $D(x)<0$ for some $x$ in $(0,1)$.
Answer. Replacing $u$ by $-u$ does not change the right side, since numerator and denominator both change sign. So the inequality holds for all $x$ in $(0,1)$ exactly when $0<|u|\le|k|$, and the largest $c$ is $$c=|k|=\Big|\ln\frac ab\Big| .$$ When $a=b$ this gives $c=0$. Indeed, then every $u\ne0$ fails, so no positive $c$ works.
How we checked it: script: for (a, b) = (3, 1), (1, 5), (2, 2.5), (10, 0.3), the inequality holds on a fine grid of x for |u| up to |ln(a/b)| and fails at 1.01Β·|ln(a/b)|