A homomorphism collapses its kernel to the identity and keeps everything else apart. The first isomorphism theorem says that this collapse is exactly a quotient group.
Why it works
The theorem is a machine for naming quotients: to identify $G/N$, find a homomorphism out of $G$ whose kernel is $N$, and look at its image. It also explains the counting rule $|G| = |\ker\varphi|\,|\operatorname{im}\varphi|$.
| Homomorphism | Kernel | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| $\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}_{n}$, reduce mod $n$ | $n\mathbb{Z}$ | $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} \cong \mathbb{Z}_{n}$ |
| $\operatorname{sgn}: S_{n} \to \{\pm 1\}$ | $A_{n}$ | $S_{n}/A_{n} \cong \mathbb{Z}_{2}$ |
| $\det: GL_{n}(\mathbb{R}) \to \mathbb{R}^{*}$ | $SL_{n}(\mathbb{R})$ | $GL_{n}(\mathbb{R})/SL_{n}(\mathbb{R}) \cong \mathbb{R}^{*}$ |
| $\mathbb{R}^{*} \to \mathbb{R}^{+}$, $x \mapsto |x|$ | $\{\pm 1\}$ | $\mathbb{R}^{*}/\{\pm 1\} \cong \mathbb{R}^{+}$ |
Worked example: A quotient of $\mathbb{Z}_{12}$
- $\varphi: \mathbb{Z}_{12} \to \mathbb{Z}_{4}$, $x \mapsto x \bmod 4$, is well defined since $4 \mid 12$, and it is a homomorphism onto $\mathbb{Z}_{4}$.
- Its kernel is $\{0, 4, 8\} = \langle 4 \rangle$.
- So $\mathbb{Z}_{12}/\langle 4 \rangle \cong \mathbb{Z}_{4}$.
Answer: $\mathbb{Z}_{4}$.
Worked example: Powers of $i$
- $i^{m + n} = i^{m}i^{n}$, so $\varphi$ is a homomorphism.
- Image $\{1, i, -1, -i\}$; kernel $\{n : i^{n} = 1\} = 4\mathbb{Z}$.
- So $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z} \cong \{1, i, -1, -i\}$.
Answer: $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z} \cong \langle i \rangle$.
Worked example: Sizes from the theorem
- Well defined: $18 \cdot 2 = 36 \equiv 0 \pmod{12}$.
- The image is $\langle 2 \rangle$ in $\mathbb{Z}_{12}$, of order $6$.
- $\mathbb{Z}_{18}/\ker\varphi \cong \operatorname{im}\varphi$, so $|\ker\varphi| = 18/6 = 3$: the kernel is $\{0, 6, 12\}$.
Answer: $3$.
The recipe, used in each example above: (1) write down a map out of $G$; (2) check that it is a homomorphism; (3) find its image (often by showing it is onto); (4) compute its kernel and check that it is the subgroup you are dividing by. Then the theorem gives the isomorphism with no further work: no need to check well-definedness on cosets by hand.
Common mistake
Key idea