Traditional LogicThe Square of Opposition

Contradictories

A and O, and E and I, are contradictories: exactly one of each pair is true.

Not started Jump to practice

On the square of opposition, the diagonals join A with O and E with I. These pairs are contradictories.

Key idea

Contradictories cannot both be true and cannot both be false: exactly one of them is true. The contradictory of "All S are P" is "Some S are not P"; the contradictory of "No S are P" is "Some S are P".

Why it works

Each pair talks about the same region of a Venn diagram and says opposite things about it. "All S are P" says region 1 (S outside P) is empty; "Some S are not P" says region 1 has something in it. A region is either empty or not, so exactly one of the two is right. The same goes for E and I with region 2. Because this reason uses no assumption about existence, the contradictories hold on every reading.
A shades region 1; O puts an X in region 1. Exactly one can be right.

Worked example

Worked example: Denying a universal

What is the contradictory of "All the cookies are burned"? (Standard form: All cookies on the tray are burned cookies.)
  1. It is an A statement, so its contradictory is the O with the same terms.
  2. To show that not all the cookies are burned, you only need one cookie that is not.

Answer: Some cookies on the tray are not burned cookies.

Worked example: Denying a negative

What is the contradictory of "No hikers are poets"?
  1. It is an E statement, so its contradictory is the I with the same terms.
  2. To show that "none" is wrong, one hiker who is a poet is enough.

Answer: Some hikers are poets.

Common mistake

Giving "No S are P" as the contradictory of "All S are P". That is the contrary, and both can be false at once (some cookies burned, some not). To deny "all", you need only "some are not". Check: could your two statements both be false? If yes, they are not contradictories.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 1 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

  • Patrick J. Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 4.5 The Traditional Square of Opposition
  • Aristotle, On Interpretation 7
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "The Traditional Square of Opposition"
@teddyrookbook GitHub