Symbolic LogicSymbols and Translation

Simple and Compound Statements

A simple statement has no other statement as a part; a compound statement is built from simpler ones with words like not, and, or, if.

Not started Jump to practice

In Hypothetical Propositions you met statements built from other statements: "If it rains, then the game is canceled" contains two smaller claims. Symbolic logic starts by taking that idea seriously. Before we can write any symbols, we have to know which pieces of a sentence are the building blocks.

A simple statement makes one claim and has no other statement inside it: "Maya is at the park." A compound statement is built from one or more simpler statements with a word like not, and, or, if … then or if and only if: "Maya is at the park and Leo is at home."

Key idea

A statement is compound when it has another statement as a part, joined or changed by a connective word. Otherwise it is simple. A negation such as "Maya is not at the park" counts as compound: it is built from "Maya is at the park".

Why it works

Logic cares about which claims depend on which. If a statement is compound, its truth depends on the truth of its parts; "Maya is at the park and Leo is at home" is true only when both parts are. A simple statement has no parts to depend on, so in symbolic logic it gets a single letter, like $p$. Splitting sentences correctly is what makes the later rules work.

Worked examples

Worked example: Find the simple parts

"Either the library is open or the bookstore is open." Simple or compound? If compound, what are its parts?
  1. Look for a connective word: "either … or".
  2. It joins two claims: "the library is open" and "the bookstore is open".
  3. Each of those has no smaller statement inside it, so each is simple.

Answer: Compound, with two simple parts.

Worked example: One relation, not two claims

"Ava and Ben are cousins." Simple or compound?
  1. The word "and" appears, so check what it joins.
  2. Try splitting: "Ava is a cousin and Ben is a cousin." That is not what the sentence says; "cousin" needs someone to be a cousin of.
  3. The sentence states one relation between two people. "And" joins two names, not two statements.

Answer: Simple.

Worked example: A hidden "not"

"Ava is unhappy about the rain." Simple or compound?
  1. "Un-" is part of the word "unhappy", not the connective "not".
  2. There is no smaller statement inside it.

Answer: Simple.

Common mistake

Calling "Ava and Ben are cousins" compound because of the word "and". Test it: can you rewrite the sentence as two complete claims joined by "and", each true or false on its own, without changing the meaning? "Ava and Ben finished the puzzle" passes the test (Ava finished, Ben finished). "Ava and Ben are cousins", "met at the library" or "shook hands" do not. They are simple.
Sort each statement. Check explains the ones that are easy to get wrong.
  • Look for the connective words: not, and, but, or, either … or, neither … nor, if … then, only if, unless, if and only if.
  • Check that each connective joins whole statements, not just names or words.
  • Count a negation as compound, with one part.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 1 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

  • Patrick J. Hurley and Lori Watson, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 13th ed., section 6.1, Symbols and Translation
  • forall x: Calgary, an open introduction to formal logic (P. D. Magnus, Tim Button and others; Open Logic Project), chapter on sentential connectives
@teddyrookbook GitHub