Informal LogicFallacies of Presumption and Weak Induction

Accident

Accident applies a general rule to a special case that the rule was never meant to cover.

Not started Jump to practice

The last fallacy of this unit is the mirror image of hasty generalization. There the rule was bad; here the rule is good but misapplied.

Key idea

Accident applies a general rule to a special case that the rule was never meant to cover.

Why it works

Most rules are made for ordinary cases and have unstated exceptions. "No running in the halls" is about safety on normal days; running out during a fire alarm serves the same safety goal. Forcing the rule onto the special case defeats its purpose.
A good rule forced onto an exception.

Worked example: A special case

"People should keep their promises. Ava promised to meet Ben at noon, but she stopped to help a child who fell off a bike. So Ava did something wrong."
  1. Keeping promises is a good rule.
  2. It was never meant to forbid helping someone who is hurt.

Answer: Accident.

Worked example: An ordinary case

"Library books are due in three weeks. Leo's book is five weeks old and nothing special delayed it. So Leo owes the late fee."
  1. Is anything special about this case? No: nothing delayed the book.
  2. This is the very kind of case the rule was written for.

Answer: Not a fallacy.

Common mistake

Calling this hasty generalization. In accident, the rule is fine in general; the mistake is forcing it onto an exception. In hasty generalization, the rule itself was drawn from too few cases.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

  • OpenStax Introduction to Philosophy, 5.5 Informal Fallacies
  • Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Fallacies"
  • Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, chapter 3 (fallacies of weak induction and presumption)
  • Aristotle, Sophistical Refutations (accident)
@teddyrookbook GitHub