Skip to content

FlightThe Wright Brothers

The Wright Brothers: Gliders and the Wind Tunnel

Wilbur (1867–1912) and Orville (1871–1948) Wright solved control first with wing-warping, then found the tables of lift were wrong and built a wind tunnel in 1901.

Not started Jump to practice

Wilbur Wright (1867–1912) and Orville Wright (1871–1948) grew up in Dayton, Ohio, in a family of seven children; their father was a bishop. Neither finished high school with a diploma. They ran a printing business, then from 1892 a bicycle shop, where they built and repaired bikes. In 1878 their father had brought home a toy helicopter driven by a twisted rubber band. They never forgot it.

Key idea

The Wrights saw that a flying machine needs three things: wings for lift, an engine and propellers for push, and control to balance and steer. Others focused on engines; the Wrights solved control first, with wing-warping, and then found that the published data on wings was wrong, so they measured it themselves in a wind tunnel.

The problem

By the 1890s gliders had flown. In Germany, Otto Lilienthal made about 2,000 glides on wings he hung from, steering by swinging his body. In 1896 he lost control in a gust, crashed, and died. The Wrights read about his death and began studying flight seriously. In 1899 Wilbur wrote to the Smithsonian Institution asking for reading:

I am an enthusiast, but not a crank in the sense that I have some pet theories as to the proper construction of a flying machine. I wish to avail myself of all that is already known and then if possible add my mite to help on the future worker who will attain final success.

Wilbur Wright, Letter to the Smithsonian Institution, May 30, 1899. Smithsonian Institution Archives; quoted by the Wright Brothers Aeroplane Company. Read it.

How the idea came: twisting a box

Watching birds, Wilbur saw that they balance by twisting the tips of their wings, so one side gets more lift than the other. How could a machine do that? In the shop, he idly twisted a long, thin cardboard box that had held a bicycle inner tube. The top and bottom twisted in opposite directions at each end, yet the box stayed strong. Two wings joined like that, a biplane, could be twisted with cords. They called it wing-warping. In 1899 they tested it on a five-foot kite. It worked.

What they tried, and what failed

They picked Kitty Hawk, on the Outer Banks of North Carolina, after asking the Weather Bureau where winds were strong and steady; the soft sand made landings safer. Their 1900 glider flew mostly as a kite. Their 1901 glider, bigger and built using the best published tables, gave only about a third of the lift the tables promised, and it was hard to control. They went home discouraged.

The wind tunnel, 1901

Instead of giving up, they tested the tables. In their shop they built a wooden box about 6 feet long with a fan driven by the shop's engine, and inside it a balance made from bicycle spokes and hacksaw blades. They tested about 200 small wing shapes at different angles, measuring lift and drag. They found that a number everyone had used for over a century, Smeaton's coefficient, was too large: about 0.0033 rather than 0.005. They also learned which wing shapes and proportions worked best: long, narrow wings with a gentle curve.

Key idea

The Wrights used the lift equation $L = k\,S\,V^2\,C_L$: lift $L$ in pounds, wing area $S$ in square feet, air speed $V$ in miles per hour, $C_L$ the lift coefficient for the wing shape and angle (from their tunnel), and $k$ the Smeaton coefficient. Lift grows with the square of the speed.
Change the angle of attack and the air speed. Compare the lift the old tables promised (Smeaton's 0.005) with the Wrights' measured value (0.0033). Past about 15 to 20 degrees the wing stalls.

Worked example: Using their numbers

A wing has area 300 square feet and $C_L = 0.5$. At 20 mph, what lift does the Wrights' equation give with $k = 0.0033$?
  1. $L = 0.0033 \times 300 \times 20^2 \times 0.5$.
  2. $20^2 = 400$; $0.0033 \times 300 = 0.99$; $0.99 \times 400 = 396$; $396 \times 0.5 = 198$.

Answer: About 198 pounds.

Worked example: What the old number promised

With Smeaton's old $k = 0.005$, the same wing would seem to give how much lift?
  1. $0.005 \times 300 \times 400 \times 0.5 = 300$ pounds.
  2. That is about 1.5 times the true value: a big enough error to wreck a design.

Answer: 300 pounds, which they never got.

The 1902 glider: control in three directions

Their 1902 glider used the tunnel data, and it lifted as predicted. But in some turns it slid sideways and spun. They added a tail rudder, then made it movable and linked it to the wing-warping. Now they could control the machine in all three directions: nose up and down (pitch, with a front elevator), wings tipping (roll, by warping), and nose left and right (yaw, with the rudder). They made somewhere between 700 and 1,000 glides that fall. That three-axis control is still how airplanes are flown.

Timeline
WhenWhat happened
1867Wilbur born near Millville, Indiana
1871Orville born in Dayton, Ohio
1878Their father gives them a toy helicopter
1892They open the Wright Cycle Company
1896Otto Lilienthal dies in a glider crash
1899Wilbur writes to the Smithsonian; the wing-warping kite
1900First glider at Kitty Hawk
1901Disappointing glider; Wilbur's talk to the Western Society of Engineers; the wind tunnel
1902Glider with movable rudder: three-axis control

Worked example: Lift and speed

If air speed doubles and nothing else changes, what happens to lift?
  1. Lift goes with $V^2$.
  2. $2^2 = 4$.

Answer: It becomes 4 times larger.

What it led to

With control solved and reliable wing data, only power was missing. That is the next topic.

Common mistake

Thinking the Wrights succeeded because they had a better engine. Their engine was modest. Their edge was control, careful measurement, and the habit of testing what everyone else took for granted.

Read more: Wright brothers.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Nothing before it: a good place to start.

Leads to

Sources and further reading