Great IdeasKnowing and thinking

How we know anything

What knowledge is, and how it differs from guessing or belief.

The question

What is knowledge, and where does it come from: from reason, from the senses, or from both?

The stops on a time line 8 stops, from 375 BC to 1912. Each number is a stop below, placed at its year.
  1. 1 Plato 375 BC
  2. 2 Aristotle 340 BC
  3. 3 René Descartes 1641
  4. 4 John Locke 1689
  5. 5 George Berkeley 1710
  6. 6 David Hume 1748
  7. 7 Immanuel Kant 1781
  8. 8 Bertrand Russell 1912
  • Mainly from reason
  • Mainly from the senses and experience
  • From both working together

How the books answer

Oldest first. Each stop is our own short summary of what the author argued; follow the link to the rung for the whole lesson.

  1. c. 375 BC

    Plato, The Republic, Books VI–X

    Mainly from reason

    Plato pictures prisoners in a cave who see only shadows on a wall and take them for real things. The senses, he says, show us shadows; real knowledge is of unchanging truths, which the mind reaches by reasoning. Education is the slow climb out of the cave into the sunlight.

    Go to the rung: Plato: The Republic, Books VI–X

  2. c. 350–322 BC

    Aristotle, Metaphysics

    From both working together

    Aristotle begins with the senses: we love seeing even when it is useless. Experience builds up from many memories, but knowledge proper means grasping the reasons and causes behind things. Unlike Plato, he looks for the general truths inside the things we see.

    “All men by nature desire to know.”

    Aristotle, Metaphysics I.1, 980a. Translated by W. D. Ross (The Works of Aristotle, vol. VIII, 2nd edition, Clarendon Press, 1928). Internet Archive.

    Go to the rung: Aristotle: Metaphysics

  3. 1641

    René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, with the Objections and Replies

    Mainly from reason

    Descartes sets aside everything that could possibly be doubted, including the senses. What survives is that he is thinking, so he must exist. From there he tries to rebuild knowledge on ideas so clear and distinct that reason cannot doubt them.

    “I am, I exist, is necessarily true each time it is expressed by me, or conceived in my mind.”

    René Descartes, Meditations, II. Translated by John Veitch (Descartes' Meditations and Selections from the Principles of Philosophy, Open Court, 1913). Internet Archive.

    Go to the rung: Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy

  4. 1689

    John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

    Mainly from the senses and experience

    Locke denies that we are born with any ideas built in. The mind starts like blank paper, and all its ideas come from experience: from the senses and from noticing our own thinking. Knowledge is then the mind seeing how its ideas agree or disagree.

    “To this I answer, in one word, from experience: in that all our knowledge is founded, and from that it ultimately derives itself.”

    John Locke, Essay, Book II, ch. I, §2. (An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Thomas Tegg, London, 1832). Internet Archive.

    Go to the rung: Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

  5. 1710

    George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge

    Mainly from the senses and experience

    Berkeley pushes Locke further. If all we ever know are our ideas, he asks, what sense does it make to speak of matter existing apart from any mind? For him, to be is to be perceived, and the steady order of the world comes from God.

    Go to the rung: Berkeley: The Principles of Human Knowledge

  6. 1748

    David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

    Mainly from the senses and experience

    Hume divides knowledge into two kinds: relations of ideas, as in math, which are certain, and matters of fact, which rest on experience. We expect the sun to rise because it always has, but reason cannot prove it will. Habit, not logic, carries us from the past to the future.

    “Custom, then, is the great guide of human life.”

    David Hume, Enquiry, Section V, Part I. (An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, reprinted from the edition of 1777, Open Court, Chicago, 1900). Internet Archive.

    Go to the rung: Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

  7. 1781; second edition 1787

    Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason

    From both working together

    Kant says Hume woke him from his slumber. He agrees that knowledge begins with experience, but argues that the mind supplies its own forms, such as space, time and cause, that shape all experience. Neither the senses nor reason can give knowledge alone.

    “Thoughts without content are void; intuitions without conceptions, blind.”

    Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Logic, Introduction. Translated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn (Critique of Pure Reason, Bohn's Philosophical Library (Project Gutenberg text), 1855). Internet Archive.

    Go to the rung: Kant: The Critique of Pure Reason

  8. 1912

    Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy

    From both working together

    Russell begins by asking whether anything can be known for certain. He separates knowing things directly, by acquaintance, from knowing about them through descriptions. He holds that some general truths, such as logic, are known by reason, while most of what we know rests on the senses.

    “Is there any knowledge in the world which is so certain that no reasonable man could doubt it?”

    Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy, Chapter I. (Williams and Norgate, London (Home University Library), 1912). Internet Archive.

    Go to the rung: Russell: The Problems of Philosophy

For young readers

How do you know your dog is in the yard? You can see him and hear him bark. That's knowing by your senses. How do you know 2 + 2 = 4? You can figure it out in your head. That's knowing by reason.

For a long time, thinkers argued about which way of knowing comes first. Many ended up saying we need both, like two eyes working together.

Talk about it

  • Name three things you know because you saw them, and three you know because you figured them out.
  • What's the difference between knowing something and just believing it?
  • In Plato's cave, the prisoners think shadows are real. Have you ever been fooled by your eyes?
  • Hume says we expect the sun to rise because it always has. Is that good enough reason?
  • How could you find out if something you read is true?

Where else on the site

Every rung tagged with this idea:

These pages are our own short synthesis, written for families. They were inspired by Mortimer J. Adler's Syntopicon, the index of great ideas in volumes 1 and 2 of Great Books of the Western World, but the questions, summaries and groupings are ours, not the Syntopicon's. Short excerpts come from public-domain translations, credited where they appear.

@teddyrookbook GitHub Sources and credits