HistoryThe Third Intermediate and Late Periods

A Divided Egypt

In the Third Intermediate Period, kings at Tanis and then Libyan dynasties ruled the north while the priests of Amun held Thebes.

Not started Jump to practice

At the end of the New Kingdom, c. 1069 BC, Egypt split into a northern kingdom and a southern one run by priests. For nearly four centuries, the Third Intermediate Period (c. 1069–664 BC), power stayed divided, shared among kings, priests and local chiefs.

Key idea

In the Third Intermediate Period, kings at Tanis in the Delta (the 21st Dynasty), and then Libyan dynasties (the 22nd and 23rd), ruled the north, while the high priests of Amun held Thebes. Later the country broke into many small realms, until the Kushite kings took over.
The centers of a divided Egypt: Tanis and Bubastis in the Delta, Thebes in the south.
The dynasties of the Third Intermediate Period overlap in time.
DynastyDates (c.)Who
21stc. 1069–945 BCkings at Tanis; high priests of Amun at Thebes
22ndc. 945–715 BCLibyan kings, beginning with Shoshenq I
23rdc. 818–715 BCa rival line of Libyan kings, at the same time as the 22nd
24thc. 727–715 BCkings of Sais in the western Delta
25thc. 747–656 BCKushite kings from Napata

Tanis

The 21st Dynasty kings built their capital at Tanis, reusing statues and blocks brought from older sites such as Pi-Ramesses. In 1939–40 the French archaeologist Pierre Montet found royal tombs inside the temple enclosure at Tanis, including that of Psusennes I with a silver coffin and a gold mask: a treasure that rivals Tutankhamun's.

Thebes and the royal mummies

At Thebes the high priests ran the south and, faced with robbers, moved the mummies of New Kingdom kings from their tombs into hidden caches for safety. One cache, at Deir el-Bahari, was found in the 1870s and cleared in 1881, with Seti I, Ramesses II and many others.

Why it works

Since the late New Kingdom, families of Libyan origin had settled in Egypt, many as soldiers. Their chiefs became powerful in the Delta, and one, Shoshenq I, took the throne. Libyan rule tended to share power out: the king's sons became high priests and governors of towns, and over time these became hereditary local princes. The result was many centers of power instead of one.

Worked example: Overlapping dynasties

The 22nd Dynasty is dated c. 945–715 BC and the 25th c. 747–656 BC. Could they have ruled at the same time?
  1. The 25th starts c. 747 BC, before the 22nd ends c. 715 BC.
  2. So for about 30 years both existed.
  3. They ruled different regions: the 22nd in the Delta, the Kushite kings from Napata, spreading north.

Answer: Yes: they overlapped, ruling different parts of the land.

Common mistake

Thinking "intermediate" means nothing happened. Temples were built and decorated, fine bronze statues were cast, and trade went on. Power was shared out among many rulers, which makes the period complicated, not empty.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

  • Ian Shaw, ed., The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford, 2000), ch. 12, The Third Intermediate Period
  • Wikipedia, "Third Intermediate Period of Egypt"
  • Wikipedia, "Tanis"
  • Wikipedia, "Royal Cache"
@teddyrookbook GitHub