HistoryThe First Intermediate Period and the Middle Kingdom

The First Intermediate Period

After the Old Kingdom, rival dynasties ruled from Herakleopolis in the north and Thebes in the south.

Not started Jump to practice

When the Old Kingdom ended, no single king ruled the whole of Egypt for about a century. Historians call this the First Intermediate Period (c. 2160–2055 BC). It was a time of rival kings and strong local leaders, and also of real change in who could hope for a good afterlife.

Key idea

After the Old Kingdom, rival dynasties ruled from Herakleopolis in the north (the 9th and 10th Dynasties) and Thebes in the south (the 11th Dynasty). Between them, local governors ran their own provinces and sometimes fought each other.
Herakleopolis (not marked) lay south of Memphis, near the mouth of the Faiyum; Thebes (Karnak) far to the south. The border between them shifted around Abydos.

Two royal houses

The rival kingdoms of the First Intermediate Period.
NorthSouth
CapitalHerakleopolis, near the FaiyumThebes
Dynasties9th and 10th11th (the Intef kings, then Mentuhotep II)
ReachLower Egypt and Middle EgyptUpper Egypt, pushing north
Outcomedefeated c. 2055 BC or laterreunited Egypt

Fighting centered on the borderlands around Abydos and Thinis. Local governors chose sides: Ankhtifi, who ruled two southern nomes from his base near Hierakonpolis, backed the north and fought the Thebans. His tomb tells of his deeds and of a famine in which, he says, he fed his people.

Why it works

Without a strong king, the power that had already shifted to provincial governors in the late Old Kingdom came fully into the open. A governor who could defend his nome, store grain and feed his people earned their loyalty. Kings now needed allies among the governors to win.

Not only chaos

Many provincial towns did well. Local workshops made their own styles of art, freed from the court's rules. And spells that had been only for kings, like the Pyramid Texts, began to be written inside the coffins of officials and their families. These Coffin Texts spread in the Middle Kingdom: a good afterlife was now hoped for by many more people.

Worked example: Reading a later text

A Middle Kingdom literary text describes the time before as one when "the land was upside down". Does this prove the First Intermediate Period was a disaster everywhere?
  1. The text was written later, under kings who had reunited Egypt.
  2. Those kings had reasons to describe the time before them as chaos that they ended.
  3. Archaeology shows many local towns and cemeteries doing well in this period.

Answer: No. It is partly a message of the later kings; the evidence on the ground is more mixed.

Common mistake

Believing later texts that paint this time as total chaos. There was war and hardship in places, but also local prosperity and new ideas; the picture of disaster is partly propaganda of the Middle Kingdom kings who ended it.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

  • Ian Shaw, ed., The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford, 2000), ch. 6, The First Intermediate Period
  • Wikipedia, "First Intermediate Period of Egypt"
  • Wikipedia, "Ankhtifi"
  • Wikipedia, "Coffin Texts"
@teddyrookbook GitHub