Archaeology and ScriptsDecipherment

How the Code Was Cracked

The keys were a bilingual text, royal names that could be matched across scripts, and Coptic, which gave the sounds of Egyptian words.

Not started Jump to practice

You have seen Champollion's breakthrough step by step. Stand back and ask what made it possible. Many people had tried before him, some for centuries. What did the successful approach have that the others lacked?

Key idea

Three keys opened the script: a bilingual text (the Rosetta Stone and others) that gave the meaning; royal names, which had to be spelled by sound and could be matched across scripts; and Coptic, the last stage of Egyptian, which gave the sounds and the words behind the signs.

Why it works

Each key solves a different part of the puzzle. A translation tells you what a text says but not how its signs work. Names tell you the sounds of some signs, but only in names. Coptic tells you what Egyptian words sounded like, so when sound signs spell out a group like m-s, you can recognize it as a real word, ⲙⲓⲥⲉ "give birth". Without all three, the decipherment would have stalled.
Three keys and what each one did.
KeyWhat it suppliedExample
Bilingual textthe meaning of a passagethe Greek of the Rosetta Stone translates its Egyptian texts
Royal namessound values of signs, tested across namesp, o and l shared by Ptolemy and Cleopatra
Copticthe sounds and vocabulary of EgyptianCoptic ⲣⲏ "sun" confirms the reading rꜥ for the sun sign
One word, rn "name", from hieroglyphs to Coptic ⲣⲁⲛ. Coptic showed the decipherers that the signs spelled real Egyptian words.

Worked example: Why not the Greek alone?

The Greek text of the Rosetta Stone tells us exactly what the decree says. Why wasn't that enough to read the hieroglyphs?
  1. A translation gives meaning, not sounds. Knowing a passage means "the king gave silver to the temples" does not tell you which signs spell "silver".
  2. The hieroglyphic text is also damaged, and the two versions do not follow each other word for word.
  3. Names and Coptic were needed to link signs to sounds, and sounds to words.

Answer: Because a translation does not show which signs carry which sounds and words.

Worked example: Using Coptic

Sound signs in a cartouche spell r-ꜥ-m-s-s, with the sun sign first. How does Coptic help confirm that the first part means "sun" and the middle "born"?
  1. Coptic, written in Greek letters with vowels, has ⲣⲏ "sun" and ⲙⲓⲥⲉ "to give birth".
  2. Those words have the same consonants as the sign groups: r for the sun, m-s for birth.
  3. So the reading is not a guess: it matches real Egyptian words that were still known through the Coptic Church.

Answer: The Coptic words for "sun" and "give birth" have the same consonants.

Common mistake

Thinking the Greek translation alone was enough. Without Coptic, the sounds of the words would have stayed unknown. A quick check: could you read a page of a language you have never heard, given only a loose translation? You would know what it means, but not how to read it.
Champollion also overestimated how close Coptic was to the language of the pharaohs, and some of his readings were wrong for that reason. Coptic is a guide, not a key that fits every lock.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

@teddyrookbook GitHub