Hieroglyphs, hieratic and Demotic write consonants only. That is why Egyptologists add e between consonants to say words aloud: nfr is said "nefer" by convention. Coptic, with its full set of vowel letters, is the first stage of the language to show how words actually sounded.
Key idea
Why it works
| Egyptian | Convention | Coptic | Sound in Coptic | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rn | ren | ⲣⲁⲛ | ran | the vowel shows: a |
| nfr | nefer | ⲛⲟⲩϥⲉ | noufe | final r lost |
| nṯr | netjer | ⲛⲟⲩⲧⲉ | noute | ṯ became t; final r lost |
| ḫpr | kheper | ϣⲱⲡⲉ | shōpe | ḫ became sh; final r lost |
| mw | mu | ⲙⲟⲟⲩ | mou | the w is written ⲟⲩ |
| rꜥ | Ra | ⲣⲏ | rē | ꜥ lost; the vowel is ē |
Worked example: Hearing a word
- ⲱ = ō, ⲛ = n, ϩ = h.
- So: ōnh. The ꜥ left no trace, and ḫ became h.
- The familiar "ankh" is a modern convention, not the Coptic sound.
Answer: ōnh.
Worked example: Earlier evidence
- No. Coptic ⲛⲟⲩϥⲉ shows the word about 2,500 years after Khufu.
- Earlier evidence exists in a few places, such as Egyptian names spelled in cuneiform letters of the New Kingdom (Ramesses II's name appears in Hittite records as Riamašeša), but it is patchy.
- So vowels before Coptic are reconstructed with real uncertainty.
Answer: No: it shows only the late pronunciation.
Dialects add a further layer: the same word can have different vowels in Sahidic and Bohairic, as you will see in the next topic.
Common mistake