Int. MicroConsumer Choice

Corners and Kinks

Perfect substitutes lead to buying only the good with more utility per dollar; perfect complements are bought in fixed proportions.

Not started Jump to practice

The tangency rule from The Best Affordable Bundle assumes smooth, bowed indifference curves and some of both goods. Two of the families in Substitutes, Complements, Cobb-Douglas and Quasilinear break those assumptions, and so do budgets too small for a tangency.

Key idea

Perfect substitutes $U = ax + by$: compare utility per dollar, $a/p_1$ and $b/p_2$, and spend all income on the good with the higher value (any split if they tie). Perfect complements $U = \min\{ax, by\}$: buy at the corner where $ax = by$, so $x^* = \dfrac{m}{p_1 + p_2\,a/b}$.

Why it works

For substitutes, every dollar on $x$ buys $a/p_1$ units of utility and every dollar on $y$ buys $b/p_2$, no matter how much you already have. So each dollar should go to the better deal, and so should the next one: all of them. The MRS $a/b$ is constant, so it equals $p_1/p_2$ only by coincidence (the tie case). For complements, any unit of $x$ beyond $ax = by$ adds nothing, so money spent on it is wasted; the cheapest way to any utility level is the corner, and the budget picks which corner.
$U = x + 2y$ with $p_1 = 3$, $p_2 = 4$: a dollar on $y$ gives $2/4 = 0.5$ util, on $x$ only $1/3$. The best bundle is the corner (0, 15).

Worked example: Perfect substitutes

$U = x + 2y$, $p_1 = 3$, $p_2 = 4$, $m = 60$.
  1. Per dollar: $x$ gives $1/3$, $y$ gives $2/4 = 1/2$.
  2. $y$ is the better deal at every bundle, so all \$60 goes to $y$: $y = 15$, $x = 0$.
  3. Check against an interior bundle: $(4, 12)$ costs \$60 and gives $4 + 24 = 28$, less than $0 + 30 = 30$.

Answer: $(0, 15)$.

Worked example: Perfect complements

$U = \min\{x, 2y\}$, $p_1 = 2$, $p_2 = 6$, $m = 50$.
  1. Buy at the corner $x = 2y$.
  2. Budget: $2(2y) + 6y = 50$, so $10y = 50$, $y = 5$, $x = 10$.
  3. Formula check: $x^* = \dfrac{50}{2 + 6\cdot\tfrac{1}{2}} = \dfrac{50}{5} = 10$.

Answer: $(10, 5)$.

Worked example: A quasilinear corner

$U = 8\sqrt{x} + y$, $p_1 = 1$, $p_2 = 2$, $m = 20$.
  1. Tangency would need $\dfrac{4}{\sqrt{x}} = \dfrac{1}{2}$, so $x = 64$, which costs \$64.
  2. She has only \$20. At every affordable bundle $MRS = 4/\sqrt{x} \ge 4/\sqrt{20} > 1/2$, so she always wants more $x$.
  3. Best bundle: all income on $x$, so $x = 20$, $y = 0$.

Answer: $(20, 0)$.

Common mistake

Setting the MRS equal to the price ratio for perfect substitutes. For $U = x + 2y$ with $p_1/p_2 = 3/4$, the equation $1/2 = 3/4$ has no solution, and forcing a "mix" gives a bundle that is worse than the corner. Compare utility per dollar instead. Check: whatever bundle you find, compare its utility with the two corners $(m/p_1, 0)$ and $(0, m/p_2)$.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

This is one of the top rungs of Intermediate Microeconomics.

Sources and further reading

  • OpenStax Principles of Microeconomics 3e, appendix B Indifference Curves
  • MIT OpenCourseWare 14.04 Intermediate Microeconomic Theory (course scope and lecture topics)
@teddyrookbook GitHub