Int. MicroExternalities and Information

Adverse Selection and Lemons

When sellers know quality and buyers don't, good products can be driven out of the market.

Not started Jump to practice

In Insurance the insurer knew each buyer's risk. Often one side of a deal knows more. With the market model of Market Equilibrium, hidden information can make a market shrink or vanish.

Key idea

Adverse selection: when one side knows the quality (or risk) before the deal and the other can't tell, the price reflects only the average, so the best types may refuse to trade. The goods (or customers) left in the market are worse on average, which pushes the price down further. George Akerlof (1970) called it the market for "lemons."

Why it works

Suppose a share $\pi$ of used cars are good and the rest are lemons, and buyers can't tell them apart. A risk-neutral buyer will pay at most the average value, $\pi B_g + (1 - \pi)B_l$. If that is below what owners of good cars require, $S_g$, those owners keep their cars. Buyers then know that only lemons are for sale, and pay at most $B_l$. Trades that would help both sides (a good car is worth more to a buyer than to its owner) never happen. The same logic hits insurance: at a price set for average risk, low-risk people may drop out, raising the average risk of those who remain.
Across: $\pi$, the share of good cars. Up: thousands of dollars. Good cars are worth \$6,000 to buyers and lemons \$2,000, so a random car is worth $2 + 4\pi$ thousand; good-car owners need \$5,000. Only when at least 3/4 of cars are good does a random car's value reach that.

Worked example: Does the market for good cars survive?

Half the cars are good. Buyers value good cars at \$6,000 and lemons at \$2,000; owners of good cars need \$5,000; owners of lemons need \$1,000.
  1. A random car is worth $\tfrac{1}{2}(6{,}000) + \tfrac{1}{2}(2{,}000) = 4{,}000$ to a buyer.
  2. That is below the \$5,000 good-car owners need, so they don't sell.
  3. Only lemons trade, at a price between \$1,000 and \$2,000, even though every good car is worth \$1,000 more to a buyer than to its owner.

Answer: No: only lemons are sold.

Worked example: The threshold

Same values. What share of good cars keeps them in the market?
  1. Need $\pi(6{,}000) + (1 - \pi)(2{,}000) \ge 5{,}000$.
  2. $2{,}000 + 4{,}000\pi \ge 5{,}000$, so $\pi \ge 3/4$.

Answer: At least $3/4$.

Common mistake

Mixing up adverse selection with moral hazard. Adverse selection is hidden information that exists before the deal (the car's quality, the buyer's health); it changes who trades. Moral hazard is a hidden action after the deal (driving carelessly once insured). Check: ask whether the problem would exist even if everyone's behavior stayed the same after signing. If yes, it is adverse selection.
Markets and governments respond in several ways: warranties and inspections, reputations and reviews, signals (next lessons), pricing by observable risk, and in some insurance markets rules that require or encourage broad participation. Which mix works best in a given market is a matter of evidence and debate.

See how beliefs about hidden types work in Incomplete Information and Bayesian Games.

Go deeper in the Business coursesIncomplete Information and Bayesian Games

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 3 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

  • OpenStax Principles of Microeconomics 3e, ch. 16.1 The Problem of Imperfect Information and Asymmetric Information
  • OpenStax Principles of Microeconomics 3e, ch. 16.2 Insurance and Imperfect Information
  • MIT OpenCourseWare 14.04 Intermediate Microeconomic Theory (course scope and lecture topics)
@teddyrookbook GitHub