Debate · Tools

Judge's ballots

Printable ballots for practice rounds, scrimmages and club tournaments, plus a simple scoring sheet. At a real tournament, use the ballot the tournament gives you; these follow the same shape so new judges and debaters know what to expect.

Policy Debate Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Resolution
SideTeam or debater codeSpeakersPointsRank
Affirmative1A:
2A:
Negative1N:
2N:

Give each speaker points on your league's scale (check the tournament's instructions) and rank the speakers in the round. In most leagues the winning team may not have fewer points than the losing team unless the judge marks a "low-point win."

Decision: The better debating was done by on the ☐ Affirmative / ☐ Negative.
Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the Affirmative One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Negative One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

Lincoln-Douglas Debate Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Resolution
SideTeam or debater codeSpeakersPointsRank
AffirmativeAff:
NegativeNeg:

Give each speaker points on your league's scale (check the tournament's instructions) and rank the speakers in the round. In most leagues the winning team may not have fewer points than the losing team unless the judge marks a "low-point win."

Decision: The better debating was done by on the ☐ Affirmative / ☐ Negative.
Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the Affirmative One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Negative One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

Public Forum Debate Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Resolution
SideTeam or debater codeSpeakersPointsRank
First-speaking teamA1:
A2:
Second-speaking teamB1:
B2:

Give each speaker points on your league's scale (check the tournament's instructions) and rank the speakers in the round. In most leagues the winning team may not have fewer points than the losing team unless the judge marks a "low-point win."

Decision: The better debating was done by on the ☐ First-speaking team / ☐ Second-speaking team.
Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the First-speaking team One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Second-speaking team One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

Congressional Debate Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Legislation
LegislatorSpeech (Aff/Neg) or questionsScoreComments

Score each speech on the scale your tournament gives. Judge clash with earlier speakers, evidence, organization, delivery and answers in questioning.

Top legislators in this session, ranked
Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the Affirmative (for the legislation) One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Negative (against the legislation) One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

World Schools Debate Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Motion
SideTeam or debater codeSpeakersPointsRank
PropositionP1:
P2:
P3:
OppositionO1:
O2:
O3:

Give each speaker points on your league's scale (check the tournament's instructions) and rank the speakers in the round. In most leagues the winning team may not have fewer points than the losing team unless the judge marks a "low-point win."

Decision: The better debating was done by on the ☐ Proposition / ☐ Opposition.
Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the Proposition One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Opposition One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

British Parliamentary Debate Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Motion
TeamTeam name or codeSpeakers and pointsTeam rank (1st to 4th)
Opening GovernmentPrime Minister: pts Deputy Prime Minister: pts
Opening OppositionLeader of the Opposition: pts Deputy Leader of the Opposition: pts
Closing GovernmentMember for the Government: pts Government Whip: pts
Closing OppositionMember for the Opposition: pts Opposition Whip: pts

Rank the four teams from first to fourth; there are no ties in rank. Speaker points follow your tournament's scale. Higher-ranked teams usually get higher total points.

Ranking: 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the Opening Government One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Opening Opposition One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Closing Government One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Closing Opposition One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

American Parliamentary Debate (APDA and NPDA) Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Motion
SideTeam or debater codeSpeakersPointsRank
GovernmentPrime Minister:
Member of Government:
OppositionLeader of the Opposition:
Member of the Opposition:

Give each speaker points on your league's scale (check the tournament's instructions) and rank the speakers in the round. In most leagues the winning team may not have fewer points than the losing team unless the judge marks a "low-point win."

Decision: The better debating was done by on the ☐ Government / ☐ Opposition.
Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the Government One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Opposition One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

Oxford-Style Public Debate Ballot

Teddy Rook Book · practice ballot

Tournament or event Round Room Date Judge Judge's school or club (if any) Motion
SideTeam or debater codeSpeakersPointsRank
For the motionFirst speaker for:
Second speaker for:
Against the motionFirst speaker against:
Second speaker against:

Give each speaker points on your league's scale (check the tournament's instructions) and rank the speakers in the round. In most leagues the winning team may not have fewer points than the losing team unless the judge marks a "low-point win."

Decision: The better debating was done by on the ☐ For the motion / ☐ Against the motion.

Many public debates also poll the audience before and after; the side that changes more minds wins. Follow your organizer's rules. Before: For Against Undecided · After: For Against Undecided

Reason for decision What decided the round? Which arguments did you weigh, and why?
Comments for the For the motion One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.
Comments for the Against the motion One thing that worked, one thing to try next time.

Judge's signature

Simple scoring sheet

For practice rounds and club meetings · Teddy Rook Book

Type names and tap scores from 1 (needs work) to 5 (excellent). Totals add up as you go, and the sheet is saved in this browser. Print it filled in, or print it blank for judges to fill by hand.

Topic
SpeakerSideArgumentsEvidenceRefutationOrganizationDeliveryQuestionsTotal
What to work on
Arguments
Clear claims with reasons that link to the resolution.
Evidence
Sources that are real, relevant, fairly quoted and cited.
Refutation
Answers the other side's best points directly.
Organization
Signposts ("my first point…") and stays on time.
Delivery
Clear, audible, steady pace, eye contact, respectful tone.
Questions
Asks short, useful questions and gives truthful, direct answers.

What judges look for

  • Lay judges (parents, teachers, community members) decide like a thoughtful listener: who was clearer, more convincing and easier to follow. Speak plainly, explain jargon and slow down.
  • Flow judges (former debaters and coaches) take notes on every argument and decide on what was said and answered. A dropped argument usually counts for the side that made it, and new arguments in the last speeches usually don't count.
  • Every judge rewards honest evidence, direct answers to the other side, and a clear explanation in the last speech of why you win.
  • Write a reason for decision a debater can learn from: the argument that decided it and why, not just "good job."

Read more in Learn to Debate. For timing the round, use the debate timer.

@teddyrookbook GitHub