Art History IIThe Dutch Golden Age

Landscape and Still Life

Jacob van Ruisdael painted skies over flat land and windmills; still lifes of flowers, food and skulls (vanitas) by Rachel Ruysch and Pieter Claesz reminded viewers that life is short.

Not started Jump to practice

Two genres flourished on the Dutch market: landscapes of the flat, watery country, and still lifes of flowers, food and fine things. Both look like plain records of what was there. Both were carefully composed.

Looking closely: The Windmill at Wijk bij Duurstede

Jacob van Ruisdael, The Windmill at Wijk bij Duurstede, about 1668 to 1670. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.

Describe. A tall, round stone windmill rises above a riverbank, with a few small figures, a sailboat and the roofs of a town. Most of the canvas is sky, heavy with clouds. Analyze. The horizon is set very low, so the sky fills about two-thirds of the picture. The mill, seen from below, stands dark against bright clouds, and a band of sunlight crosses the middle ground. Interpret. Jacob van Ruisdael (about 1628 to 1682) made a portrait of the Dutch land: water, wind and a mill that turns wind into work. Viewers also read the weather as feeling, a sense of grandeur in an ordinary place.

Key idea

Dutch painters made landscapes of their flat land and huge skies (Jacob van Ruisdael) and still lifes of flowers, food and objects (Rachel Ruysch, Pieter Claesz); vanitas still lifes reminded viewers that life is short.

Still life and vanitas

Pieter Claesz, Vanitas Still Life, 1630. Mauritshuis, The Hague.

A vanitas (Latin for "emptiness," from a Bible verse about the vanity of all things) is a still life whose objects warn that life is short: a skull, a candle snuffed out, a watch, books, an overturned glass. Pieter Claesz (about 1597 to 1660) painted this one in browns, grays and greens, with a soft light that shows each texture: bone, paper, brass, glass. The objects are beautiful, and that is the point: even beautiful things pass.

Why it works

Still lifes let painters show off their skill at textures, and they let buyers own something precious, even rare flowers, in paint. They also carried meanings that a Protestant household could hang on its wall: thoughts about time and death, and the gifts of trade and nature, without a religious scene.

Common mistake

People think a flower still life shows one real bouquet. Painters combined flowers that bloom in different seasons, spring tulips with summer roses, painted from separate studies over months. Rachel Ruysch (1664 to 1750), the most famous flower painter of her day and court painter in Düsseldorf from 1708, built her bouquets this way. Check: would all these flowers bloom at the same time?
Rachel Ruysch, Still Life with Flowers in a Glass Vase, about 1690 to 1720. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.

Worked example: A real bouquet?

A painting shows tulips (spring), roses (early summer) and a sunflower-like marigold (late summer) all in full bloom. Was it painted from one bouquet?
  1. Tulips bloom in spring; these roses in early summer; marigolds late in the season.
  2. They could not all be fresh in one vase at once in the 1600s.
  3. The painter combined separate studies into one composed bouquet.

Answer: No: it combines flowers from different seasons.

Sort each Dutch painting into its genre.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

This is one of the top rungs of Art History II: Baroque to Modern.

Sources and further reading

@teddyrookbook GitHub