Linear A and BWhat the Tablets Tell

Offerings to the Gods

Tablets list offerings of oil, honey and gold vessels to gods; Pylos tablet Tn 316 records gold vessels and people brought to Zeus, Hera and others.

Not started Jump to practice

In Gods on the Tablets you met the gods by name. The same tablets tell what was given to them, where and sometimes when. Some of these records are easy to read; one of them is among the most debated texts in the whole archive.

Key idea

Tablets list offerings of oil, honey, grain, animals and gold vessels to gods. Pylos tablet Tn 316 records gold vessels, and men and women, brought to Zeus, Hera and others. Some scholars read those people as human offerings; others as servants given to the gods' service. The text does not settle it.
An extract from Tn 316. Step through: signs, transliteration, Greek, English. Notice VIR (man) and MUL (woman) after the gold bowls.

Ordinary offerings

Most religious tablets are plain lists. Pylos sends perfumed oil to Poseidon and to goddesses called Potnia. A Knossos tablet sends a jar of honey (me-ri) to Eileithyia, goddess of childbirth, at Amnisos. Others send wheat, wine or animals to shrines, sometimes dated by month. They show a calendar of festivals run partly through the palace.

Tn 316: a hard tablet

Tn 316 is a page-shaped tablet written on both sides. It lists shrines and gods, and for each a gold vessel and, often, a man or a woman. The extract above shows three entries. The question is what the people were for. One reading: they were sacrificed, perhaps in an emergency as the palace faced its end. Another: they were given to the god as servants of the shrine, as later temples had temple servants. A few have suggested other readings.

Two main readings of Tn 316. Neither is proved.
ReadingFor itAgainst it
Human offeringsPeople are listed exactly like the gold vessels, as giftsNo word on the tablet says "sacrifice"; such sacrifice is rare in Greek evidence
Temple servantsLater Greek shrines had servants given to the godThe tablet does not say they served; it only lists them

Why it works

Why can't the tablet settle it? Because it is an account, not a description. It says what went where, with logograms for "man" and "woman" and numbers; it gives no verb for what happened to them. Any reading must add information from outside the tablet, so scholars still disagree.

Common mistake

Taking one reading of a hard tablet as fact. Some scholars read Tn 316's people as human offerings; others as servants given to the gods' service. Check: when a book says "the Mycenaeans sacrificed humans at Pylos", ask what the tablet actually says: a god's name, a gold bowl, VIR 1.

Worked example: Read an entry

Read the first entry of the extract: 𐀇𐀸 𐂛 𐃬 𐄇 𐂀 𐄇.
  1. di-we: to Zeus (dative).
  2. AUR *213VAS 1: one gold bowl.
  3. VIR 1: one man.

Answer: To Zeus: a gold bowl, 1; a man, 1.

Worked example: What can be said?

Which statement does Tn 316 support: (a) Zeus received a gold bowl; (b) a man was sacrificed to Zeus?
  1. (a) is written: di-we, the gold and vessel signs, 1.
  2. (b) adds an interpretation the tablet does not state.

Answer: (a) only.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 3 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

This is one of the top rungs of Linear A and Linear B.

Sources and further reading

@teddyrookbook GitHub