U.S. History IThe Civil War and Reconstruction (1861 to 1877)D2.His.14.9-12

The Union and the Confederacy

The Union had far more people, factories and railroads; the Confederacy fought on its own ground with skilled generals; the Union's Anaconda Plan aimed to blockade the coast and seize the Mississippi.

Not started Jump to practice

After secession and Fort Sumter, both sides expected a short war. Each believed the other would give up after a battle or two. Looking at what each side had, and what each side needed to do, helps explain why it lasted four years.

Key idea

The Union had far more people (about 22 million in the loyal states, against about 5.5 million free people and 3.5 million enslaved people in the Confederacy), about 90 percent of the country's manufacturing, and more than twice the railroad mileage. The Confederacy fought mostly on its own ground, had skilled generals such as Robert E. Lee, and needed only to survive. The Union's Anaconda Plan aimed to blockade the Southern coast and seize the Mississippi River.

Why it works

The two sides had different goals, and that matters as much as the numbers. The Union had to invade, conquer and hold a huge territory to bring the seceded states back. The Confederacy only had to make the North tired of the cost, as the colonists had once made Britain give up. Southern leaders also hoped that Britain and France, which needed Southern cotton for their mills, would recognize the Confederacy. They never did.
Sort each advantage.
Rounded figures from the 1860 census, as historians report them.
Union (loyal states)Confederacy
Free population, 1860about 22 millionabout 5.5 million
Enslaved populationabout 430,000 (border states)about 3.5 million
Railroad mileage, 1860about 22,000 milesabout 9,500 miles
Share of manufacturingabout 90 percentabout 10 percent
The eleven Confederate states (highlighted) and the four border states (B). The Mississippi River runs between Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi and Tennessee.

Worked example: Reading the Anaconda Plan

General Winfield Scott's plan in 1861 was to squeeze the Confederacy like a giant snake. What were its two parts, and why would they hurt the South?
  1. Blockade the Atlantic and Gulf coasts: the South sold cotton abroad and bought weapons and goods abroad, so a blockade cut both.
  2. Take control of the Mississippi River: that would split Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas from the rest of the Confederacy and open the river to Northern trade.
  3. Many Northerners wanted a quick march on Richmond instead and mocked the plan as too slow.
  4. In the end the Union did both: the blockade tightened every year, and Vicksburg's fall in July 1863 gave the Union the river.

Answer: A naval blockade and control of the Mississippi, to cut the South's trade and split it in two.

Common mistake

It is a mistake to think the Union's advantages made the outcome certain. The Confederacy only had to survive until the North gave up, and for much of the war it seemed it might: Union armies lost many early battles in Virginia, and as late as August 1864 Lincoln expected to lose reelection. Victory took four years and depended on battlefield results and Northern will. Check: resources make an outcome more likely, not certain.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

@teddyrookbook GitHub