U.S. History IColonial America (1607 to 1754)D2.His.1.9-12

Comparing the Colonial Regions

Compare New England (towns, trade, fishing, small farms), the Middle colonies (wheat, ports, diversity) and the South (cash crops, plantations, slavery) and explain why geography and settlers made them differ.

Not started Jump to practice

You have met all three regions: New England, the Middle colonies and the South. AP questions often ask you to compare them and, above all, to explain why they differed.

Key idea

New England: towns, churches, small farms, fishing, shipbuilding and trade. Middle colonies: wheat farms, busy ports and the most diverse people and faiths. Southern colonies: cash crops (tobacco, rice, indigo), plantations and slavery. Geography and the settlers' goals explain the differences.

Why it works

Start with the land. New England has rocky soil, hills and short summers, but good harbors, forests and rich fishing grounds, so people farmed small plots and turned to the sea. The Middle colonies have fertile valleys and a mild climate that grow wheat well, and wide rivers that carried it to port. The South has a long growing season and flat, wet coastal land, ideal for tobacco and rice, crops that paid best when grown on large plantations with many workers. Then add the settlers: Puritan families in New England built close-knit towns around churches; Penn's promise of religious freedom drew a mix of peoples to the Middle colonies; Southern planters sought profit and bought enslaved labor.
The three colonial regions compared.
New EnglandMiddle coloniesSouthern colonies
Land and climateRocky soil, short summers, good harborsFertile valleys, mild climate, big riversLong growing season, rich coastal lowlands
EconomySmall farms, fishing, shipbuilding, tradeWheat and grain, ports, tradeTobacco, rice, indigo, plantations
People and faithMostly English Puritan familiesMany peoples and faithsEnglish planters and small farmers; many enslaved Africans
CommunitiesTowns with town meetingsFarms, towns and port citiesSpread-out farms and plantations; few towns

Worked example: Explain a difference

Why did slavery grow much larger in South Carolina than in Massachusetts, though it was legal in both?
  1. Rice in South Carolina needed many workers in hot, wet fields all year.
  2. Massachusetts farms were small, and its trades needed fewer field workers.
  3. So planters in the South bought enslaved Africans in large numbers; in Massachusetts, enslaved people were fewer and worked mostly in homes, shops and ports.

Answer: The crop and the land made the demand for labor very different.

Common mistake

Students often sort colonies by one memorized fact ("Pennsylvania = Quakers"). That works until a question asks why. Tie each region's economy to its land and climate, then to its settlers. Remember too that regions overlapped: there were merchants in Charleston and enslaved people in New York.

Practice

Pass with 3 right answers, the last 2 in a row. Each right answer earns 2 XP.

Loading practice…

Builds on

Leads to

Sources and further reading

@teddyrookbook GitHub